From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759834Ab3B0Mnl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:43:41 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:48809 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753583Ab3B0Mnk (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:43:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:43:30 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Peter Jones , Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , David Howells , Florian Weimer , Josh Boyer , Vivek Goyal , Kees Cook , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries Message-ID: <20130227124330.GA2905@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20130226033156.GA24999@kroah.com> <20130226033803.GA30285@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226035416.GA1128@kroah.com> <20130226040456.GA30717@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226041324.GA7241@kroah.com> <20130226042338.GA30944@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226220618.GK32160@fenchurch.internal.datastacks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:32:30PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > So revocation will only be done by the guest OS? > I.e. if I only boot my own trusted Linux, even if it's signed with the MS key, > the MS key _on my system_ will never be revoked? As long as you never apply any updates that will revoke that key. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org