* [PATCH] Regulator: db8500-prcmu - remove incorrect __exit markup
@ 2013-02-25 3:26 Dmitry Torokhov
2013-03-01 6:05 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2013-02-25 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: Liam Girdwood, Lee Jones, linux-kernel
Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, the devices can be unbound from the
driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
platform_driver_probe() which specifically disables sysfs bind/unbind
attributes.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/regulator/db8500-prcmu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/regulator/db8500-prcmu.c
index 219d162..a53c11a 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/db8500-prcmu.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/db8500-prcmu.c
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static int db8500_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-static int __exit db8500_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int db8500_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
int i;
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static struct platform_driver db8500_regulator_driver = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
.probe = db8500_regulator_probe,
- .remove = __exit_p(db8500_regulator_remove),
+ .remove = db8500_regulator_remove,
};
static int __init db8500_regulator_init(void)
--
1.7.11.7
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Regulator: db8500-prcmu - remove incorrect __exit markup
2013-02-25 3:26 [PATCH] Regulator: db8500-prcmu - remove incorrect __exit markup Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2013-03-01 6:05 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-03-01 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: Liam Girdwood, Lee Jones, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 432 bytes --]
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:26:25PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, the devices can be unbound from the
> driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
> remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
> platform_driver_probe() which specifically disables sysfs bind/unbind
> attributes.
Applied, thanks. Should've been __devexit up until that getting
removed.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-01 6:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-25 3:26 [PATCH] Regulator: db8500-prcmu - remove incorrect __exit markup Dmitry Torokhov
2013-03-01 6:05 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox