From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Don Morris <don.morris@hp.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:24:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130301112432.GA3018@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130301110310.GA31058@pd.tnic>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37:10PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out. I am wondering if
> > there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.
>
> How much would it hurt us if we said 3.8 is the last kernel that supported NUMAQ?
> If anyone wants the functionality, they should use 3.8 or older.
v3.9 - any non-trivial patch in the stage of being contemplated near the end of the
v3.9 merge window is most likely v3.10 material.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 15:02 sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! Tim Gardner
2013-02-25 15:32 ` Tim Gardner
2013-02-25 21:27 ` Don Morris
2013-02-25 22:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 0:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 2:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 3:21 ` Martin Bligh
2013-02-26 4:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 4:51 ` Martin Bligh
2013-02-26 6:09 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-26 6:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 7:29 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-26 7:53 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-01 6:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-01 8:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-01 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-01 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-03-01 15:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-26 1:51 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-26 21:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 22:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 0:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 2:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 3:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 4:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 4:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 5:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 5:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 6:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 7:11 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-27 7:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 7:44 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-28 16:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 1:39 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-27 8:00 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-27 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-28 10:01 ` Tang Chen
2013-03-01 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 3:46 ` Tang Chen
2013-03-01 4:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 4:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQXb7K=QTR4PgMdNSoPm2LgYkxAuXUUZ0BXtgicQOGOaUA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-01 6:02 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-01 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 15:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-01 22:51 ` [PATCH] x86, ACPI, mm: Revert movablemem_map support Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 6:18 ` sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! Tang Chen
2013-03-01 8:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 8:39 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-01 7:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 11:32 ` Tang Chen
2013-03-01 19:31 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <CAD11hGx5N9Eqy5bX-SEv9c7oR6Ehz2pUJwdrK0Q=L4S44RC5gg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-02 5:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-27 12:40 ` Don Morris
2013-02-27 16:28 ` Luck, Tony
2013-02-27 17:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 17:50 ` Luck, Tony
2013-02-27 2:14 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-27 2:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 4:32 ` Tang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130301112432.GA3018@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=don.morris@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox