public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
       [not found] <5131ad43.H709l5IR4X+pbvbq%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
@ 2013-03-02 13:12 ` Steven Rostedt
  2013-03-02 13:15   ` Steven Rostedt
  2013-03-02 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2013-03-02 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild test robot; +Cc: LKML

On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 15:41 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git tip/perf/core
> head:   f44f8638e47c89fa5c612a18f324ba6222b69597
> commit: 50b85fe13be0878f13eecd36d1219828ba73316d [5/15] tracing: Replace the static global per_cpu arrays with allocated per_cpu
> 
> 
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> 
> >> kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:110:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:110:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:110:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>

I'm confused to exactly what sparse is complaining about?

It's barfing on every instance of my code that references a dynamically
allocated 'per_cpu' instance. Did I do that wrong?

Hmm, actually it seems to be complaining everywhere but in trace.c which
is where the per_cpu was allocated. Do I need to annotate the trace.h
header to specify (at least to sparse) that the pointer is allocated per
cpu?

-- Steve


> --
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:187:15: sparse: symbol 'ftrace_return_to_handler' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:268:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:268:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:268:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:283:5: sparse: symbol 'trace_graph_thresh_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:353:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:353:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:353:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:372:6: sparse: symbol 'trace_graph_thresh_return' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:1358:6: sparse: symbol 'print_graph_headers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> --
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:24:8: sparse: symbol 'tracing_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:124:17: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:124:17:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:124:17:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> --
> >> kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:29:29: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:29:29:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:29:29:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:86:29: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:86:29:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:86:29:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> --
> >> kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:333:40: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:333:40:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:333:40:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:366:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:366:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:366:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> --
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:72:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:72:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:72:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:126:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:126:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:126:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> --
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:92:17: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:92:17:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:92:17:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:356:20: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:356:20:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:356:20:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:368:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:368:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:368:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:390:21: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:390:21:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:390:21:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:438:20: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:438:20:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:438:20:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:461:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:461:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:461:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:475:21: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:475:21:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
>    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:475:21:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> 
> vim +79 kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> 
>     73	
>     74		bit = trace_test_and_set_recursion(TRACE_FTRACE_START, TRACE_FTRACE_MAX);
>     75		if (bit < 0)
>     76			goto out;
>     77	
>     78		cpu = smp_processor_id();
>   > 79		data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->data, cpu);
>     80		if (!atomic_read(&data->disabled)) {
>     81			local_save_flags(flags);
>     82			trace_function(tr, ip, parent_ip, flags, pc);
>     83		}
>     84		trace_clear_recursion(bit);
>     85	
>     86	 out:
>     87		preempt_enable_notrace();
>     88	}
>     89	
>     90	static void
>     91	function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
>     92				  struct ftrace_ops *op, struct pt_regs *pt_regs)
>     93	{
>     94		struct trace_array *tr = func_trace;
>     95		struct trace_array_cpu *data;
>     96		unsigned long flags;
>     97		long disabled;
>     98		int cpu;
>     99		int pc;
>    100	
>    101		if (unlikely(!ftrace_function_enabled))
>    102			return;
>    103	
>    104		/*
>    105		 * Need to use raw, since this must be called before the
>    106		 * recursive protection is performed.
>    107		 */
>    108		local_irq_save(flags);
>    109		cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>  > 110		data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->data, cpu);
>    111		disabled = atomic_inc_return(&data->disabled);
>    112	
>    113		if (likely(disabled == 1)) {
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel build testing backend              Open Source Technology Center
> http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild                 Intel Corporation



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
  2013-03-02 13:12 ` [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) Steven Rostedt
@ 2013-03-02 13:15   ` Steven Rostedt
  2013-03-02 13:23     ` Fengguang Wu
  2013-03-02 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2013-03-02 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild test robot; +Cc: LKML

On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 08:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> Hmm, actually it seems to be complaining everywhere but in trace.c which
> is where the per_cpu was allocated. Do I need to annotate the trace.h
> header to specify (at least to sparse) that the pointer is allocated per
> cpu?

I guess I need this patch:

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index c597523..50a9c81 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ struct trace_array {
        struct list_head        systems;
        struct list_head        events;
        struct task_struct      *waiter;
-       struct trace_array_cpu  *data;
+       struct trace_array_cpu __percpu *data;
 };
 
 enum {

-- Steve



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
  2013-03-02 13:12 ` [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) Steven Rostedt
  2013-03-02 13:15   ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2013-03-02 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2013-03-02 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: LKML, Christopher Li

// add CC to Christopher.

On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:12:52AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 15:41 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git tip/perf/core
> > head:   f44f8638e47c89fa5c612a18f324ba6222b69597
> > commit: 50b85fe13be0878f13eecd36d1219828ba73316d [5/15] tracing: Replace the static global per_cpu arrays with allocated per_cpu
> > 
> > 
> > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > 
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:110:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:110:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:110:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> 
> I'm confused to exactly what sparse is complaining about?
> 
> It's barfing on every instance of my code that references a dynamically
> allocated 'per_cpu' instance. Did I do that wrong?
> 
> Hmm, actually it seems to be complaining everywhere but in trace.c which
> is where the per_cpu was allocated. Do I need to annotate the trace.h
> header to specify (at least to sparse) that the pointer is allocated per
> cpu?
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > --
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:187:15: sparse: symbol 'ftrace_return_to_handler' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:268:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:268:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:268:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:283:5: sparse: symbol 'trace_graph_thresh_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:353:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:353:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:353:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:372:6: sparse: symbol 'trace_graph_thresh_return' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >    kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:1358:6: sparse: symbol 'print_graph_headers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > --
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:24:8: sparse: symbol 'tracing_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:124:17: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:124:17:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:124:17:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:421:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:383:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > --
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:29:29: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:29:29:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:29:29:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:86:29: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:86:29:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:86:29:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > --
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:333:40: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:333:40:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:333:40:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:366:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:366:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c:366:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > --
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:72:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:72:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:72:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:126:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:126:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c:126:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > --
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:92:17: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:92:17:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:92:17:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:356:20: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:356:20:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:356:20:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:368:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:368:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:368:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:390:21: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:390:21:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:390:21:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:438:20: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:438:20:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:438:20:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:461:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:461:16:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:461:16:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > >> kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:475:21: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:475:21:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:3>*__vpp_verify
> >    kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c:475:21:    got struct trace_array_cpu *<noident>
> > 
> > vim +79 kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> > 
> >     73	
> >     74		bit = trace_test_and_set_recursion(TRACE_FTRACE_START, TRACE_FTRACE_MAX);
> >     75		if (bit < 0)
> >     76			goto out;
> >     77	
> >     78		cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >   > 79		data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->data, cpu);
> >     80		if (!atomic_read(&data->disabled)) {
> >     81			local_save_flags(flags);
> >     82			trace_function(tr, ip, parent_ip, flags, pc);
> >     83		}
> >     84		trace_clear_recursion(bit);
> >     85	
> >     86	 out:
> >     87		preempt_enable_notrace();
> >     88	}
> >     89	
> >     90	static void
> >     91	function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> >     92				  struct ftrace_ops *op, struct pt_regs *pt_regs)
> >     93	{
> >     94		struct trace_array *tr = func_trace;
> >     95		struct trace_array_cpu *data;
> >     96		unsigned long flags;
> >     97		long disabled;
> >     98		int cpu;
> >     99		int pc;
> >    100	
> >    101		if (unlikely(!ftrace_function_enabled))
> >    102			return;
> >    103	
> >    104		/*
> >    105		 * Need to use raw, since this must be called before the
> >    106		 * recursive protection is performed.
> >    107		 */
> >    108		local_irq_save(flags);
> >    109		cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> >  > 110		data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->data, cpu);
> >    111		disabled = atomic_inc_return(&data->disabled);
> >    112	
> >    113		if (likely(disabled == 1)) {
> > 
> > ---
> > 0-DAY kernel build testing backend              Open Source Technology Center
> > http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild                 Intel Corporation
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
  2013-03-02 13:15   ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2013-03-02 13:23     ` Fengguang Wu
  2013-03-03  6:12       ` Christopher Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2013-03-02 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: LKML, Christopher Li

On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 08:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, actually it seems to be complaining everywhere but in trace.c which
> > is where the per_cpu was allocated. Do I need to annotate the trace.h
> > header to specify (at least to sparse) that the pointer is allocated per
> > cpu?
> 
> I guess I need this patch:

That's it!  Verified with

        make C=1 kernel/trace/trace_functions.o

Thanks,
Fengguang

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index c597523..50a9c81 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ struct trace_array {
>         struct list_head        systems;
>         struct list_head        events;
>         struct task_struct      *waiter;
> -       struct trace_array_cpu  *data;
> +       struct trace_array_cpu __percpu *data;
>  };
>  
>  enum {
> 
> -- Steve
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
  2013-03-02 13:23     ` Fengguang Wu
@ 2013-03-03  6:12       ` Christopher Li
  2013-03-03  6:42         ` Fengguang Wu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Li @ 2013-03-03  6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: Steven Rostedt, LKML

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> That's it!  Verified with
>
>         make C=1 kernel/trace/trace_functions.o

You can use C=2 to run sparse without recompile the obj file.

Chris

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
  2013-03-03  6:12       ` Christopher Li
@ 2013-03-03  6:42         ` Fengguang Wu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2013-03-03  6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christopher Li; +Cc: Steven Rostedt, LKML

On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM -0800, Christopher Li wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > That's it!  Verified with
> >
> >         make C=1 kernel/trace/trace_functions.o
> 
> You can use C=2 to run sparse without recompile the obj file.

Got it, thanks!

Fengguang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-03  6:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <5131ad43.H709l5IR4X+pbvbq%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2013-03-02 13:12 ` [trace:tip/perf/core 5/15] kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:79:16: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 13:15   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 13:23     ` Fengguang Wu
2013-03-03  6:12       ` Christopher Li
2013-03-03  6:42         ` Fengguang Wu
2013-03-02 13:15   ` Fengguang Wu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox