From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753154Ab3CCKoE (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2013 05:44:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44456 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752369Ab3CCKoC (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2013 05:44:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:43:21 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen , Oleg Nesterov , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Corey Ashford , Frederic Weisbecker , Vince Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] signal x86: Clear RF EFLAGS bit for signal handler Message-ID: <20130303104321.GA1024@krava.redhat.com> References: <1362161512-16803-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1362161512-16803-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <5130FA2E.9010502@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5130FA2E.9010502@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:57:50AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 03/01/2013 10:11 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > Clearing RF EFLAGS bit for signal handler. The reason is, > > that this flag is set by debug exception code to prevent > > the recursive exception entry. > > > > Leaving it set for signal handler might prevent debug > > exception of the signal handler itself. > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c > > index b6fe116..e273571 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c > > @@ -726,6 +726,13 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka, > > regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_DF; > > > > /* > > + * Clear RF when entering the signal handler, because > > + * it might disable possible debug exception from the > > + * signal handler. > > + */ > > + regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_RF; > > + > > + /* > > * Clear TF when entering the signal handler, but > > * notify any tracer that was single-stepping it. > > * The tracer may want to single-step inside the > > > > Makes sense. However, can you combine all the flags-clearing into one > statement while you are at it? sure, will send v2 thanks, jirka