From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: PATCH: freezer: add fake signal clearing back when thaw task
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 18:32:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130304173231.GA5442@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFUiJjy-7sS9xH76XMLs5SU6fUQ1Bk4Xn67jjHeZNQRjC54dg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/04, Lianwei Wang wrote:
>
> Freeze/Thaw is a hot path for the Linux based mobile OS, e.g. Android.
> If we don't remove the pending fake signal, then the user space apps
> or the related kernel driver has to handle such error.
But if we add recalc_sigpending() we penalize the common case which
doesn't need this.
> And yes, the
> user can handle such case by checking the return value,
Yes.
> but it mislead
> the user and confuse to them that why wait_event_freezable and friends
> return a error on resume path every time? Can we avoid such useless
> error return?
Agreed, it looks strange. It is only for kthreads, I think. And we can
simplify wait_event_freezable() or even kill it.
But if we add new user-space users, I do not know... Fortunately I am
not maintainer ;)
> >> +static void fake_signal_clear(struct task_struct *p)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long flags;
> >> +
> >> + if (lock_task_sighand(p, &flags)) {
> >> + recalc_sigpending();
This looks strange. p is always current, otherwise recalc_sigpending()
can't help.
And since it is current you do not need lock_task_sighand().
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 6:19 PATCH: freezer: add fake signal clearing back when thaw task Lianwei Wang
2013-02-25 23:53 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-26 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-26 14:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-26 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-04 3:24 ` Lianwei Wang
2013-03-04 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-04 17:32 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130304173231.GA5442@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=lianwei.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox