From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IMA: How to manage user space signing policy with others
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:46:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130304174628.GC15199@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130304152919.GA15199@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:29:19AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[..]
> This reduces our options but trying to make multiple policies co-exist
> together is just making it complicated. We can take it up again when
> somebody has a strong use case of using secureboot policy along with
> other policies.
Well, I also see the unused hook for module verification. Right now there
is no policy for that but if we ever decide to do module verification
using ima hook, then we will have this question that where does that
rule go in now.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-28 15:13 IMA: How to manage user space signing policy with others Vivek Goyal
2013-02-28 18:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-28 20:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 20:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01 1:42 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 19:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 20:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01 1:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 21:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-28 22:20 ` Eric Paris
2013-03-01 1:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-01 12:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-01 15:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01 19:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-01 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-03 21:42 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-04 15:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-04 17:46 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-03-04 18:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-04 19:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-05 1:21 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-05 15:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-05 20:40 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-05 21:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-06 15:42 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-06 23:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 1:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-07 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 15:40 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-07 15:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 17:53 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-03-07 21:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-08 8:09 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-03-08 15:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-06 15:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-06 22:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-06 23:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 13:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-07 14:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-04 19:19 ` Eric Paris
2013-03-04 21:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01 2:17 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130304174628.GC15199@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox