From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"Eran Ben-Avi" <benavi@marvell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@marvell.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@marvell.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:30:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201303042030.01817.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130304172850.5e18fbfb@skate>
On Monday 04 March 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> FWIW, a patch that is doing what I was initially proposing has been
> merged for 3.9, and it doesn't contain the
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) test you were proposing (and which I
> think was correct). See:
>
> commit 9ed8a30f3471347c1b763bd062fa78ae80f18eae
> Author: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> Date: Wed Feb 27 17:02:42 2013 -0800
>
Sigh.
I'll take it as an additional incentive to finally clean up the logic behind
CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT by introducing a CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP symbol to replace it.
Thanks for the heads up.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1360686546-24277-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2013-02-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT Thomas Petazzoni
2013-02-12 18:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-12 18:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-02-12 22:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-04 16:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-04 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-03-06 6:28 Jingoo Han
2013-03-06 8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-06 8:40 Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201303042030.01817.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=benavi@marvell.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=maen@marvell.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=shadi@marvell.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox