From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] perf: Fix vmalloc ring buffer free function
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:37:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130306153752.GA19141@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTL4hyBN=pBao_AnrXsAj06t534hyO=3mpc=1_yM0feO0=gRw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:20:15PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/3/1 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>:
> > If we allocate perf ring buffer with the size of single page,
> > we will get memory corruption when releasing it. It's caused
> > by rb_free_work function (CONFIG_PERF_USE_VMALLOC option).
> >
> > For single page sized ring buffer the page_order is -1 (because
> > nr_pages is 0). This needs to be recognized in the rb_free_work
> > function to release proper amount of pages.
> >
> > Introducing page_nr function (CONFIG_PERF_USE_VMALLOC only)
> > that returns number of allocated pages. Using it in rb_free_work
> > and perf_mmap_to_page functions.
> >
> > Also setting rb->nr_pages to 0 in case we have only user page
> > allocated, which will fail perf_output_begin function and
> > prevents sample storage.
> >
> > v2 changes:
> > - fixed the perf_output_begin handling of single page buffer
> >
> > Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> > index 23cb34f..a802151 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> > @@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ int perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> > if (head - local_read(&rb->wakeup) > rb->watermark)
> > local_add(rb->watermark, &rb->wakeup);
> >
> > - handle->page = offset >> (PAGE_SHIFT + page_order(rb));
> > + /* page is allways 0 for CONFIG_PERF_USE_VMALLOC option */
> > + handle->page = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > handle->page &= rb->nr_pages - 1;
> > handle->size = offset & ((PAGE_SIZE << page_order(rb)) - 1);
> > handle->addr = rb->data_pages[handle->page];
> > @@ -312,11 +313,21 @@ void rb_free(struct ring_buffer *rb)
> > }
> >
> > #else
> > +/*
> > + * Returns the total number of pages allocated
> > + * by ring buffer including the user page.
> > + */
> > +static int page_nr(struct ring_buffer *rb)
> > +{
> > + return page_order(rb) == -1 ?
> > + 1 : /* no data, just user page */
> > + 1 + (1 << page_order(rb)); /* user page + data pages */
> > +}
>
> Could be simply rb->nr_page + 1 ?
>
> Patch looks good in any case. Thanks.
nope, because CONFIG_PERF_USE_VMALLOC rb uses only 1st slot
of rg->data_pages[], so rb->nr_page is either 0 or 1
the actuall number of pages is counted via rb->page_order
(which is -1 for case with no data pages)
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-01 16:34 [PATCHv2] perf: Fix vmalloc ring buffer free function Jiri Olsa
2013-03-06 14:30 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2013-03-06 15:20 ` [PATCHv2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-06 15:37 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2013-03-06 15:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-11 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-11 11:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-11 12:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-11 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-11 16:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-11 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-11 18:02 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-12 10:05 ` [PATCHv3] " Jiri Olsa
2013-03-12 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-12 10:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-12 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-12 13:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-12 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-12 15:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-12 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-12 17:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-13 11:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-18 19:05 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-03-19 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-19 14:35 ` [PATCHv4] perf: Fix vmalloc ring buffer pages handling Jiri Olsa
2013-04-30 15:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-01 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-02 7:54 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130306153752.GA19141@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox