From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932610Ab3CGLHE (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 06:07:04 -0500 Received: from 8bytes.org ([85.214.48.195]:48399 "EHLO mail.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932255Ab3CGLHC (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 06:07:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:06:59 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH] buildtar: Add ARCH to the archive name Message-ID: <20130307110659.GC22602@8bytes.org> References: <1362557147-14393-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1362557147-14393-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Mar 7 12:07:00 2013 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9992 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 513874d423678364715335 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:05:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov > > When dealing with multiple sub-arches (like 32- and 64-bit on x86, for > example) generating a bunch of kernel tar archives with the same name > but for different sub-arches could get confusing and error-prone. Also, > the build process could overwrite otherwise unrelated builds and you > probably don't want that. So, add the architecture to the archive name > for more clarity and less shoot-yourself-in-the-foot practices. > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Good idea, but I already hear people yelling about their scripts that break with this change :) Joerg