From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 3.9-rc1 NULL pointer crash at find_pid_ns
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:04:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130307180417.GV3268@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5138D377.6040406@oracle.com>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:50:47PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 12:46 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 12:36 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like the hlist change is probably the issue, though it specifically
> >> uses:
> >>
> >> #define hlist_entry_safe(ptr, type, member) \
> >> (ptr) ? hlist_entry(ptr, type, member) : NULL
> >>
> >> I'm still looking at the code in question and it's assembly, but I can't
> >> figure out what's going wrong. I was also trying to see what's so special
> >> about this loop in find_pid_ns as opposed to the rest of the kernel code
> >> that uses hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() but couldn't find out why.
> >>
> >> Is it somehow possible that if we rcu_dereference_raw() the same thing twice
> >> inside the same rcu_read_lock() section we'll get different results? That's
> >> really the only reason for this crash that comes to mind at the moment, very
> >> unlikely - but that's all I have right now.
> >
> > Yep
> >
> > #define hlist_entry_safe(ptr, type, member) \
> > (ptr) ? hlist_entry(ptr, type, member) : NULL
> >
> > Is not safe, as ptr can be evaluated twice, and thats not good at all...
>
> ptr is being evaluated twice, but in this case this is an
> rcu_dereference_raw() value within the same rcu_read_lock() section.
>
> Is it still problematic?
Sigh! Eric is right -- if "ptr" involves side effects, evaluating
it twice is completely broken.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 9:37 3.9-rc1 NULL pointer crash at find_pid_ns CAI Qian
2013-03-07 9:42 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-07 9:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-07 17:36 ` Sasha Levin
2013-03-07 17:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-07 17:50 ` Sasha Levin
2013-03-07 18:04 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-03-07 18:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-07 18:14 ` Sasha Levin
2013-03-07 18:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-07 18:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-07 18:27 ` Sasha Levin
2013-03-07 18:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-09 8:01 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-09 15:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-14 20:00 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-14 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-07 18:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130307180417.GV3268@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox