From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] x86, ACPI: make acpi override finding work with 32bit flat mode
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:50:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130308055023.GF14556@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362718720-27048-5-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:58:30PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> We will find acpi tables in initrd during head_32.S in 32bit flat mode.
>
> So need acpi_initrd_override_find could take phys directly.
The patch description doesn't explain even half of what's going on.
> @@ -552,38 +552,47 @@ u8 __init acpi_table_checksum(u8 *buffer, u32 length)
> return sum;
> }
>
> -/* All but ACPI_SIG_RSDP and ACPI_SIG_FACS: */
> -static const char * const table_sigs[] = {
> - ACPI_SIG_BERT, ACPI_SIG_CPEP, ACPI_SIG_ECDT, ACPI_SIG_EINJ,
> - ACPI_SIG_ERST, ACPI_SIG_HEST, ACPI_SIG_MADT, ACPI_SIG_MSCT,
> - ACPI_SIG_SBST, ACPI_SIG_SLIT, ACPI_SIG_SRAT, ACPI_SIG_ASF,
> - ACPI_SIG_BOOT, ACPI_SIG_DBGP, ACPI_SIG_DMAR, ACPI_SIG_HPET,
> - ACPI_SIG_IBFT, ACPI_SIG_IVRS, ACPI_SIG_MCFG, ACPI_SIG_MCHI,
> - ACPI_SIG_SLIC, ACPI_SIG_SPCR, ACPI_SIG_SPMI, ACPI_SIG_TCPA,
> - ACPI_SIG_UEFI, ACPI_SIG_WAET, ACPI_SIG_WDAT, ACPI_SIG_WDDT,
> - ACPI_SIG_WDRT, ACPI_SIG_DSDT, ACPI_SIG_FADT, ACPI_SIG_PSDT,
> - ACPI_SIG_RSDT, ACPI_SIG_XSDT, ACPI_SIG_SSDT, NULL };
Why is this table made a stack variable? What's the benefit of doing
that?
> /* Non-fatal errors: Affected tables/files are ignored */
> #define INVALID_TABLE(x, path, name) \
> - { pr_err("ACPI OVERRIDE: " x " [%s%s]\n", path, name); continue; }
> + do { pr_err("ACPI OVERRIDE: " x " [%s%s]\n", path, name); } while (0)
Might as well rename the macro to something which indicates it's just
printing error message. Urgh... who thought embedding control flow
directive like continue inside a macro was a good idea? :(
> -void __init acpi_initrd_override_find(void *data, size_t size)
> +void __init acpi_initrd_override_find(void *data, size_t size, bool is_phys)
Is it really necessary to make the function take both virtual and
physical addresses? Can't we just make the function take phys_addr_t
and update everyone to call with physaddr? Also @is_phys isn't simple
address switch. It also changes error reporting. If you're gonna
keep @is_phys, let's at least write up a function comment explaining
what's going on and why we need it. But, really, if at all possible,
let's change the function to take single type of argument and
predicate error message printing on something else (e.g. early printk
initialized or whatever).
> @@ -654,11 +677,14 @@ void __init acpi_initrd_override_copy(void)
> arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_tables_addr, all_tables_size);
>
> for (no = 0; no < table_nr; no++) {
> + unsigned long phys_addr = (unsigned long)early_initrd_files[no].data;
Can we please use phys_addr_t for physical addresses?
> unsigned long size = early_initrd_files[no].size;
>
> + q = early_ioremap(phys_addr, size);
> + pr_info("%4.4s ACPI table found in initrd [%#010lx-%#010lx]\n",
> + ((struct acpi_table_header *)q)->signature,
> + phys_addr, phys_addr + size - 1);
Maybe putting pr_info after ioremapping both p and q would be easier
on the eyes?
> p = early_ioremap(acpi_tables_addr + total_offset, size);
> - q = early_ioremap((unsigned long)early_initrd_files[no].data,
> - size);
> memcpy(p, q, size);
> early_iounmap(q, size);
> early_iounmap(p, size);
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-08 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-08 4:58 [PATCH 00/14] x86, ACPI, numa: Parse numa info early Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 01/14] x86, ACPI, mm: Kill max_low_pfn_mapped Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 5:10 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 5:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 5:25 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 5:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 5:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 6:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-11 22:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-11 23:09 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-12 1:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 02/14] x86, ACPI: Split find/copy from acpi_initrd_override Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 5:33 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 6:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 03/14] x86, ACPI: store override acpi tables phys addr Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 5:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 6:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 7:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86, ACPI: make acpi override finding work with 32bit flat mode Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 5:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-08 6:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 7:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 7:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:16 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-08 21:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 05/14] x86, ACPI: Find acpi tables in initrd early at head_32.S/head64.c Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 5:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 7:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 06/14] x86, mm, numa: Move successful path handling code later Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 6:04 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 07/14] x86, mm, numa: call numa_meminfo_cover_memory() early Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 08/14] x86, mm, numa: use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 6:26 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 09/14] x86, mm, numa: set memblock nid later Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 6:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 10/14] x86, mm, numa: Move emulation handling down Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 6:42 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 11/14] x86, acpi, numa: split SLIT handling out Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 6:46 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 12/14] x86, mm, numa: Add early_initmem_init() stub Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 13/14] x86, mm: Parse numa info early Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 4:58 ` [PATCH 14/14] x86, mm: Put pagetable on local node ram Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 7:01 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-08 7:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-08 8:20 ` Tang Chen
2013-03-08 17:25 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130308055023.GF14556@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox