From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753476Ab3CKR2z (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:28:55 -0400 Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:47310 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752063Ab3CKR2y (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:28:54 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 50.131.214.131 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19x/dFrk6GnVBHrN1bHFCWO Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:28:48 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API Message-ID: <20130311172847.GP26093@atomide.com> References: <20130308004011.GD11806@atomide.com> <51393B59.3070200@codeaurora.org> <20130308180730.GE11806@atomide.com> <513A2B20.30805@codeaurora.org> <20130308194802.GG11806@atomide.com> <513A40EF.8050403@codeaurora.org> <20130308200811.GJ11806@atomide.com> <513A4774.3040605@codeaurora.org> <20130308202947.GK11806@atomide.com> <513A8B22.5030008@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <513A8B22.5030008@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Stephen Boyd [130308 17:10]: > On 03/08/13 12:29, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Applying that does not seem to help, but you might want to get vexpress > > running anyways for some multiplatform sanity checks. > > > > I just built and installed qemu-linaro from their git, then ran the > > command above. Looks like stock qemu does not work for vexpress for some > > reason. You can probably use a dummy initrd and rootfs to debug this > > though :) > > So my patchset didn't break qemu? Sorry if that was unclear: Yes your patchset breaks booting vexpress in qemu. What I meant earlier is that I've ever gotten the qemu-linaro to boot vexpress and the unpatches qemu did not seem to boot vexpress at all the last time I tried few months back. Regards, Tony