From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Tom Tucker <tom@ogc.us>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Shani Michaeli <shanim@mellanox.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] SUNRPC: rpcrdma_register_default_external: Dynamically allocate ib_phys_buf
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:14:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130311181450.GC30618@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363023447-22453-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:37:27AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> rpcrdma_register_default_external() is several frames into the call stack which
> goes deeper yet. You run the risk of stack corruption by declaring such a large
> automatic variable, so move the array of 'struct ib_phys_buf' objects into the
> requestor structure 'struct rpcrdma_req' (which is dynamically allocated) in
> order to silence the frame-larger-than warning.
>
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c: In function 'rpcrdma_register_default_external':
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c:1774:1: warning: the frame size of 1056 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> gcc version 4.6.3
>
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Tom Tucker <tom@ogc.us>
> Cc: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Shani Michaeli <shanim@mellanox.com>
> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> v1 - Use kmalloc() to dynamically allocate and free the array of 'struct
> ib_phys_buf' objects
>
> v2 - Move the array of 'struct ib_phys_buf' objects into struct rpcrdma_req
> and pass this request down through rpcrdma_register_external() and
> rpcrdma_register_default_external(). This is less overhead then using
> kmalloc() and requires no extra error checking as the allocation burden is
> shifted to the transport client.
Oh good--so that works, and the req is the right place to put this? How
are you testing this?
(Just want to make it clear: I'm *not* an expert on the rdma code, so my
suggestion to put this in the rpcrdma_req was a suggestion for something
to look into, not a claim that it's correct.)
--b.
>
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c | 2 +-
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c | 11 ++++++-----
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
> index e03725b..c89448b 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ rpcrdma_create_chunks(struct rpc_rqst *rqst, struct xdr_buf *target,
>
> do {
> /* bind/register the memory, then build chunk from result. */
> - int n = rpcrdma_register_external(seg, nsegs,
> + int n = rpcrdma_register_external(req, seg, nsegs,
> cur_wchunk != NULL, r_xprt);
> if (n <= 0)
> goto out;
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
> index 93726560..5b439ed 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
> @@ -1730,13 +1730,14 @@ rpcrdma_deregister_memwin_external(struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg,
> }
>
> static int
> -rpcrdma_register_default_external(struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg,
> - int *nsegs, int writing, struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
> +rpcrdma_register_default_external(struct rpcrdma_req *req,
> + struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg, int *nsegs, int writing,
> + struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
> {
> int mem_priv = (writing ? IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE :
> IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ);
> struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg1 = seg;
> - struct ib_phys_buf ipb[RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS];
> + struct ib_phys_buf *ipb = req->rl_ipb;
> int len, i, rc = 0;
>
> if (*nsegs > RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS)
> @@ -1791,7 +1792,7 @@ rpcrdma_deregister_default_external(struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg,
> }
>
> int
> -rpcrdma_register_external(struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg,
> +rpcrdma_register_external(struct rpcrdma_req *req, struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg,
> int nsegs, int writing, struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
> {
> struct rpcrdma_ia *ia = &r_xprt->rx_ia;
> @@ -1827,7 +1828,7 @@ rpcrdma_register_external(struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg,
>
> /* Default registration each time */
> default:
> - rc = rpcrdma_register_default_external(seg, &nsegs, writing, ia);
> + rc = rpcrdma_register_default_external(req, seg, &nsegs, writing, ia);
> break;
> }
> if (rc)
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
> index cc1445d..b10ed34 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ struct rpcrdma_req {
> struct ib_sge rl_send_iov[4]; /* for active requests */
> struct ib_sge rl_iov; /* for posting */
> struct ib_mr *rl_handle; /* handle for mem in rl_iov */
> + struct ib_phys_buf rl_ipb[RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS]; /* temp work array */
> char rl_base[MAX_RPCRDMAHDR]; /* start of actual buffer */
> __u32 rl_xdr_buf[0]; /* start of returned rpc rq_buffer */
> };
> @@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ int rpcrdma_register_internal(struct rpcrdma_ia *, void *, int,
> int rpcrdma_deregister_internal(struct rpcrdma_ia *,
> struct ib_mr *, struct ib_sge *);
>
> -int rpcrdma_register_external(struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *,
> +int rpcrdma_register_external(struct rpcrdma_req *, struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *,
> int, int, struct rpcrdma_xprt *);
> int rpcrdma_deregister_external(struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *,
> struct rpcrdma_xprt *, void *);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-11 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-10 15:39 [PATCH linux-next] SUNRPC: rpcrdma_register_default_external: Dynamically allocate ib_phys_buf Tim Gardner
2013-03-10 17:16 ` Tom Tucker
2013-03-10 18:20 ` Tim Gardner
2013-03-10 20:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-03-11 17:37 ` [PATCH linux-next v2] " Tim Gardner
2013-03-11 18:14 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-03-11 18:51 ` Tim Gardner
2013-03-11 19:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-03-11 19:48 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-03-11 20:00 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-03-11 21:15 ` [PATCH linux-next v3] " Tim Gardner
2013-03-11 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-03-11 23:02 ` Tom Tucker
2013-03-12 2:53 ` Tim Gardner
2013-03-12 3:40 ` Tom Tucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130311181450.GC30618@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=shanim@mellanox.com \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=tom@ogc.us \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox