From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: kvm: reset the bootstrap processor when it gets an INIT
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:30:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130311193003.GC14689@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513E2A0A.3080008@siemens.com>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:01:30PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-03-11 19:51, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Intel:
> >>> CPU 1 CPU 2 in a guest mode
> >>> send INIT
> >>> send SIPI
> >>> INIT vmexit
> >>> vmxoff
> >>> reset and start from SIPI vector
> >>
> >> Is SIPI sticky as well, even if the CPU is not in the wait-for-SIPI
> >> state (but runnable and in vmxon) while receiving it?
> >>
> > That what they seams to be saying:
> > However, an INIT and SIPI interrupts sent to a CPU during time when
> > it is in a VMX mode are remembered and delivered, perhaps hours later,
> > when the CPU exits the VMX mode
> >
> > Otherwise their exploit will not work.
>
> Very weird, specifically as SIPI is not just a binary event but carries
> payload. Will another SIPI event overwrite the previously "saved"
> vector? We are deep into an underspecified area...
My guess is that VMX INIT blocking is done by the same mechanism as
INIT blocking during SMM. Obviously after exit from SMM pending
INIT/SIPI have to be processed.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-11 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-09 6:48 [PATCH] x86: kvm: reset the bootstrap processor when it gets an INIT Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-10 11:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-10 14:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-10 15:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-10 17:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-10 18:10 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 10:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-11 10:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 11:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-11 11:51 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 13:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-11 13:54 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 14:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 14:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 14:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 14:09 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 14:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 14:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 14:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-11 15:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 17:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 17:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 17:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 17:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 18:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 18:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 18:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 18:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 18:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 18:51 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 19:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-11 19:30 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-12 9:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-03-12 11:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 14:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-11 17:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-11 17:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-11 18:04 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130311193003.GC14689@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).