From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com>,
hcochran@lexmark.com
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 5/7] tracing: Fix polling on trace_pipe_raw
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:52:23 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130312125223.4c2fe25d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130302030050.763044060@goodmis.org>
Hi Steven,
Em Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:48:38 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> escreveu:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
>
> The trace_pipe_raw never implemented polling and this was casing
> issues for several utilities. This is now implemented.
>
> Blocked reads still are on the TODO list.
I tested it and it works fine.
> Reported-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 00e5e6e..b958e9d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -3503,10 +3503,8 @@ static int tracing_release_pipe(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> }
>
> static unsigned int
> -tracing_poll_pipe(struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table)
> +trace_poll(struct trace_iterator *iter, struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table)
> {
> - struct trace_iterator *iter = filp->private_data;
> -
> if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_BLOCK) {
> /*
> * Always select as readable when in blocking mode
> @@ -3515,6 +3513,7 @@ tracing_poll_pipe(struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table)
> } else {
> if (!trace_empty(iter))
> return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> + trace_wakeup_needed = true;
> poll_wait(filp, &trace_wait, poll_table);
> if (!trace_empty(iter))
> return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> @@ -3523,6 +3522,14 @@ tracing_poll_pipe(struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table)
> }
> }
>
> +static unsigned int
> +tracing_poll_pipe(struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table)
> +{
> + struct trace_iterator *iter = filp->private_data;
> +
> + return trace_poll(iter, filp, poll_table);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * This is a make-shift waitqueue.
> * A tracer might use this callback on some rare cases:
> @@ -4312,9 +4319,8 @@ static const struct file_operations snapshot_fops = {
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRACER_SNAPSHOT */
>
> struct ftrace_buffer_info {
> - struct trace_array *tr;
> + struct trace_iterator iter;
> void *spare;
> - int cpu;
> unsigned int read;
> };
>
> @@ -4331,22 +4337,32 @@ static int tracing_buffers_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> if (!info)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - info->tr = tr;
> - info->cpu = tc->cpu;
> - info->spare = NULL;
> + info->iter.tr = tr;
> + info->iter.cpu_file = tc->cpu;
> + info->spare = NULL;
> /* Force reading ring buffer for first read */
> - info->read = (unsigned int)-1;
> + info->read = (unsigned int)-1;
>
> filp->private_data = info;
>
> return nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
> }
>
> +static unsigned int
> +tracing_buffers_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table)
> +{
> + struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = filp->private_data;
> + struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
> +
> + return trace_poll(iter, filp, poll_table);
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t
> tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = filp->private_data;
> + struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
> ssize_t ret;
> size_t size;
>
> @@ -4354,7 +4370,7 @@ tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> return 0;
>
> if (!info->spare)
> - info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(info->tr->buffer, info->cpu);
> + info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->tr->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
> if (!info->spare)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -4362,12 +4378,12 @@ tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> if (info->read < PAGE_SIZE)
> goto read;
>
> - trace_access_lock(info->cpu);
> - ret = ring_buffer_read_page(info->tr->buffer,
> + trace_access_lock(iter->cpu_file);
> + ret = ring_buffer_read_page(iter->tr->buffer,
> &info->spare,
> count,
> - info->cpu, 0);
> - trace_access_unlock(info->cpu);
> + iter->cpu_file, 0);
> + trace_access_unlock(iter->cpu_file);
> if (ret < 0)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -4392,9 +4408,10 @@ read:
> static int tracing_buffers_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = file->private_data;
> + struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
>
> if (info->spare)
> - ring_buffer_free_read_page(info->tr->buffer, info->spare);
> + ring_buffer_free_read_page(iter->tr->buffer, info->spare);
> kfree(info);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -4461,6 +4478,7 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = file->private_data;
> + struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
> struct partial_page partial_def[PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS];
> struct page *pages_def[PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS];
> struct splice_pipe_desc spd = {
> @@ -4491,8 +4509,9 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> len &= PAGE_MASK;
> }
>
> - trace_access_lock(info->cpu);
> - entries = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(info->tr->buffer, info->cpu);
> + again:
> + trace_access_lock(iter->cpu_file);
> + entries = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(iter->tr->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
>
> for (i = 0; i < pipe->buffers && len && entries; i++, len -= PAGE_SIZE) {
> struct page *page;
> @@ -4503,15 +4522,15 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> break;
>
> ref->ref = 1;
> - ref->buffer = info->tr->buffer;
> - ref->page = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(ref->buffer, info->cpu);
> + ref->buffer = iter->tr->buffer;
> + ref->page = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(ref->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
> if (!ref->page) {
> kfree(ref);
> break;
> }
>
> r = ring_buffer_read_page(ref->buffer, &ref->page,
> - len, info->cpu, 1);
> + len, iter->cpu_file, 1);
> if (r < 0) {
> ring_buffer_free_read_page(ref->buffer, ref->page);
> kfree(ref);
> @@ -4535,20 +4554,24 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> spd.nr_pages++;
> *ppos += PAGE_SIZE;
>
> - entries = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(info->tr->buffer, info->cpu);
> + entries = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(iter->tr->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
> }
>
> - trace_access_unlock(info->cpu);
> + trace_access_unlock(iter->cpu_file);
> spd.nr_pages = i;
>
> /* did we read anything? */
> if (!spd.nr_pages) {
> - if ((file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) || (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK))
> + if ((file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) || (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK)) {
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> - else
> - ret = 0;
> - /* TODO: block */
> - goto out;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + default_wait_pipe(iter);
> + if (signal_pending(current)) {
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + goto again;
> }
>
> ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> @@ -4560,6 +4583,7 @@ out:
> static const struct file_operations tracing_buffers_fops = {
> .open = tracing_buffers_open,
> .read = tracing_buffers_read,
> + .poll = tracing_buffers_poll,
> .release = tracing_buffers_release,
> .splice_read = tracing_buffers_splice_read,
> .llseek = no_llseek,
--
Cheers,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-02 2:48 [for-next][PATCH 0/7] tracing: fixups, memory savings, and block on splice Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 2:48 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/7] tracing: Get trace_events kernel command line working again Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 2:48 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/7] tracing: Use kmem_cache_alloc instead of kmalloc in trace_events.c Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 2:48 ` [for-next][PATCH 3/7] tracing: Use direct field, type and system names Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 2:48 ` [for-next][PATCH 4/7] tracing: Do not block on splice if either file or splice NONBLOCK flag is set Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 2:48 ` [for-next][PATCH 5/7] tracing: Fix polling on trace_pipe_raw Steven Rostedt
2013-03-12 15:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2013-03-02 2:48 ` [for-next][PATCH 6/7] tracing: Fix read blocking " Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 2:48 ` [for-next][PATCH 7/7] tracing/ring-buffer: Move poll wake ups into ring buffer code Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 3:06 ` [for-next][PATCH 0/7] tracing: fixups, memory savings, and block on splice Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130312125223.4c2fe25d@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hcochran@lexmark.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vnagarnaik@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox