* [PATCH 1/8] cgroup: remove cgroup_is_descentant()
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:50 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 2/8] cgroup: remove unused variables in cgroup_destroy_locked() Li Zefan
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
It was used by ns cgroup, and ns cgroup was removed long ago.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/cgroup.h | 3 ---
kernel/cgroup.c | 28 ----------------------------
2 files changed, 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
index 5f76829..7e818a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -448,9 +448,6 @@ int cgroup_path(const struct cgroup *cgrp, char *buf, int buflen);
int cgroup_task_count(const struct cgroup *cgrp);
-/* Return true if cgrp is a descendant of the task's cgroup */
-int cgroup_is_descendant(const struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *task);
-
/*
* Control Group taskset, used to pass around set of tasks to cgroup_subsys
* methods.
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index e72c44e..02b02ca 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -5036,34 +5036,6 @@ void cgroup_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, int run_callbacks)
put_css_set_taskexit(cg);
}
-/**
- * cgroup_is_descendant - see if @cgrp is a descendant of @task's cgrp
- * @cgrp: the cgroup in question
- * @task: the task in question
- *
- * See if @cgrp is a descendant of @task's cgroup in the appropriate
- * hierarchy.
- *
- * If we are sending in dummytop, then presumably we are creating
- * the top cgroup in the subsystem.
- *
- * Called only by the ns (nsproxy) cgroup.
- */
-int cgroup_is_descendant(const struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *task)
-{
- int ret;
- struct cgroup *target;
-
- if (cgrp == dummytop)
- return 1;
-
- target = task_cgroup_from_root(task, cgrp->root);
- while (cgrp != target && cgrp!= cgrp->top_cgroup)
- cgrp = cgrp->parent;
- ret = (cgrp == target);
- return ret;
-}
-
static void check_for_release(struct cgroup *cgrp)
{
/* All of these checks rely on RCU to keep the cgroup
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/8] cgroup: remove unused variables in cgroup_destroy_locked()
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] cgroup: remove cgroup_is_descentant() Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:50 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: hold cgroup_mutex before calling css_offline() Li Zefan
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 02b02ca..71bc33d 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -4347,10 +4347,8 @@ static int cgroup_destroy_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
{
struct dentry *d = cgrp->dentry;
struct cgroup *parent = cgrp->parent;
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
struct cgroup_event *event, *tmp;
struct cgroup_subsys *ss;
- LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
lockdep_assert_held(&d->d_inode->i_mutex);
lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: hold cgroup_mutex before calling css_offline()
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] cgroup: remove cgroup_is_descentant() Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 2/8] cgroup: remove unused variables in cgroup_destroy_locked() Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:50 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 4/8] cgroup: don't bother to resize pid array Li Zefan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
cpuset no longer nests cgroup_mutex inside cpu_hotplug lock, so
we don't have to release cgroup_mutex before calling css_offline().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt | 1 +
kernel/cgroup.c | 11 +----------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
index bcf1a00..0028e88 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
@@ -580,6 +580,7 @@ propagation along the hierarchy. See the comment on
cgroup_for_each_descendant_pre() for details.
void css_offline(struct cgroup *cgrp);
+(cgroup_mutex held by caller)
This is the counterpart of css_online() and called iff css_online()
has succeeded on @cgrp. This signifies the beginning of the end of
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 71bc33d..be524ac 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -4170,17 +4170,8 @@ static void offline_css(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp)
if (!(css->flags & CSS_ONLINE))
return;
- /*
- * css_offline() should be called with cgroup_mutex unlocked. See
- * 3fa59dfbc3 ("cgroup: fix potential deadlock in pre_destroy") for
- * details. This temporary unlocking should go away once
- * cgroup_mutex is unexported from controllers.
- */
- if (ss->css_offline) {
- mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
+ if (ss->css_offline)
ss->css_offline(cgrp);
- mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
- }
cgrp->subsys[ss->subsys_id]->flags &= ~CSS_ONLINE;
}
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/8] cgroup: don't bother to resize pid array
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: hold cgroup_mutex before calling css_offline() Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:50 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 5/8] cgroup: remove useless code in cgroup_write_event_control() Li Zefan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
When we open cgroup.procs, we'll allocate an buffer and store all tasks'
tgid in it, and then duplicate entries will be stripped. If that results
in a much smaller pid list, we'll re-allocate a smaller buffer.
But we've already sucessfully allocated memory and reading the procs
file is a short period and the memory will be freed very soon, so why
bother to re-allocate memory.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 37 +++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index be524ac..58ae040 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -3400,35 +3400,14 @@ static void pidlist_free(void *p)
else
kfree(p);
}
-static void *pidlist_resize(void *p, int newcount)
-{
- void *newlist;
- /* note: if new alloc fails, old p will still be valid either way */
- if (is_vmalloc_addr(p)) {
- newlist = vmalloc(newcount * sizeof(pid_t));
- if (!newlist)
- return NULL;
- memcpy(newlist, p, newcount * sizeof(pid_t));
- vfree(p);
- } else {
- newlist = krealloc(p, newcount * sizeof(pid_t), GFP_KERNEL);
- }
- return newlist;
-}
/*
* pidlist_uniq - given a kmalloc()ed list, strip out all duplicate entries
- * If the new stripped list is sufficiently smaller and there's enough memory
- * to allocate a new buffer, will let go of the unneeded memory. Returns the
- * number of unique elements.
+ * Returns the number of unique elements.
*/
-/* is the size difference enough that we should re-allocate the array? */
-#define PIDLIST_REALLOC_DIFFERENCE(old, new) ((old) - PAGE_SIZE >= (new))
-static int pidlist_uniq(pid_t **p, int length)
+static int pidlist_uniq(pid_t *list, int length)
{
int src, dest = 1;
- pid_t *list = *p;
- pid_t *newlist;
/*
* we presume the 0th element is unique, so i starts at 1. trivial
@@ -3449,16 +3428,6 @@ static int pidlist_uniq(pid_t **p, int length)
dest++;
}
after:
- /*
- * if the length difference is large enough, we want to allocate a
- * smaller buffer to save memory. if this fails due to out of memory,
- * we'll just stay with what we've got.
- */
- if (PIDLIST_REALLOC_DIFFERENCE(length, dest)) {
- newlist = pidlist_resize(list, dest);
- if (newlist)
- *p = newlist;
- }
return dest;
}
@@ -3554,7 +3523,7 @@ static int pidlist_array_load(struct cgroup *cgrp, enum cgroup_filetype type,
/* now sort & (if procs) strip out duplicates */
sort(array, length, sizeof(pid_t), cmppid, NULL);
if (type == CGROUP_FILE_PROCS)
- length = pidlist_uniq(&array, length);
+ length = pidlist_uniq(array, length);
l = cgroup_pidlist_find(cgrp, type);
if (!l) {
pidlist_free(array);
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/8] cgroup: remove useless code in cgroup_write_event_control()
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 4/8] cgroup: don't bother to resize pid array Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:50 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:51 ` [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
eventfd_poll() never returns POLLHUP.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 58ae040..3206137 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -3938,12 +3938,6 @@ static int cgroup_write_event_control(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
if (ret)
goto fail;
- if (efile->f_op->poll(efile, &event->pt) & POLLHUP) {
- event->cft->unregister_event(cgrp, event->cft, event->eventfd);
- ret = 0;
- goto fail;
- }
-
/*
* Events should be removed after rmdir of cgroup directory, but before
* destroying subsystem state objects. Let's take reference to cgroup
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-12 6:50 ` [PATCH 5/8] cgroup: remove useless code in cgroup_write_event_control() Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:51 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:52 ` [PATCH 7/8] cgroup: fix an almost harmless off-by-one bug Li Zefan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
[PATCH 6/8] cgroup: remove unneeded includes from cgroup.h
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/cgroup.h | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
index 7e818a3..1f75a59 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -9,11 +9,8 @@
*/
#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/cpumask.h>
-#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
-#include <linux/cgroupstats.h>
#include <linux/prio_heap.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
@@ -22,6 +19,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
+struct cgroupstats;
struct cgroupfs_root;
struct cgroup_subsys;
struct inode;
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 7/8] cgroup: fix an almost harmless off-by-one bug
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-12 6:51 ` [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:52 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:52 ` [PATCH 8/8] cgroup: consolidate cgroup_attach_task() and cgroup_attach_proc() Li Zefan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
The 3rd parameter of flex_array_prealloc() is the number of elements,
not the index of the last element.
The effect of the bug is, when opening cgroup.procs, a flex array will
be allocated and all elements of the array is allocated with GFP_KERNEL
flag, but the last one is GFP_ATOMIC, , and if we fail to allocate memory
for it, it'll trigger a BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 3206137..4b92b9a 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ static int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
if (!group)
return -ENOMEM;
/* pre-allocate to guarantee space while iterating in rcu read-side. */
- retval = flex_array_prealloc(group, 0, group_size - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ retval = flex_array_prealloc(group, 0, group_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (retval)
goto out_free_group_list;
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 8/8] cgroup: consolidate cgroup_attach_task() and cgroup_attach_proc()
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-12 6:52 ` [PATCH 7/8] cgroup: fix an almost harmless off-by-one bug Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:52 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 6:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] cgroup: remove unneeded includes from cgroup.h Li Zefan
2013-03-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Tejun Heo
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
These two functions share most of the code.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/cgroup.h | 3 +-
kernel/cgroup.c | 153 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
kernel/cpuset.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
index 1f75a59..013c6ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -691,7 +691,8 @@ struct task_struct *cgroup_iter_next(struct cgroup *cgrp,
struct cgroup_iter *it);
void cgroup_iter_end(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_iter *it);
int cgroup_scan_tasks(struct cgroup_scanner *scan);
-int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *, struct task_struct *);
+int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk,
+ bool threadgroup);
int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *);
/*
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 4b92b9a..14417b8 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
#include <linux/vmalloc.h> /* TODO: replace with more sophisticated array */
#include <linux/eventfd.h>
#include <linux/poll.h>
-#include <linux/flex_array.h> /* used in cgroup_attach_proc */
+#include <linux/flex_array.h> /* used in cgroup_attach_task */
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
@@ -1944,121 +1944,22 @@ static void cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
}
/**
- * cgroup_attach_task - attach task 'tsk' to cgroup 'cgrp'
- * @cgrp: the cgroup the task is attaching to
- * @tsk: the task to be attached
- *
- * Call with cgroup_mutex and threadgroup locked. May take task_lock of
- * @tsk during call.
- */
-int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- int retval = 0;
- struct cgroup_subsys *ss, *failed_ss = NULL;
- struct cgroup *oldcgrp;
- struct cgroupfs_root *root = cgrp->root;
- struct cgroup_taskset tset = { };
- struct css_set *newcg;
-
- /* @tsk either already exited or can't exit until the end */
- if (tsk->flags & PF_EXITING)
- return -ESRCH;
-
- /* Nothing to do if the task is already in that cgroup */
- oldcgrp = task_cgroup_from_root(tsk, root);
- if (cgrp == oldcgrp)
- return 0;
-
- tset.single.task = tsk;
- tset.single.cgrp = oldcgrp;
-
- for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
- if (ss->can_attach) {
- retval = ss->can_attach(cgrp, &tset);
- if (retval) {
- /*
- * Remember on which subsystem the can_attach()
- * failed, so that we only call cancel_attach()
- * against the subsystems whose can_attach()
- * succeeded. (See below)
- */
- failed_ss = ss;
- goto out;
- }
- }
- }
-
- newcg = find_css_set(tsk->cgroups, cgrp);
- if (!newcg) {
- retval = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
- }
-
- cgroup_task_migrate(cgrp, oldcgrp, tsk, newcg);
-
- for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
- if (ss->attach)
- ss->attach(cgrp, &tset);
- }
-
-out:
- if (retval) {
- for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
- if (ss == failed_ss)
- /*
- * This subsystem was the one that failed the
- * can_attach() check earlier, so we don't need
- * to call cancel_attach() against it or any
- * remaining subsystems.
- */
- break;
- if (ss->cancel_attach)
- ss->cancel_attach(cgrp, &tset);
- }
- }
- return retval;
-}
-
-/**
- * cgroup_attach_task_all - attach task 'tsk' to all cgroups of task 'from'
- * @from: attach to all cgroups of a given task
- * @tsk: the task to be attached
- */
-int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- struct cgroupfs_root *root;
- int retval = 0;
-
- cgroup_lock();
- for_each_active_root(root) {
- struct cgroup *from_cg = task_cgroup_from_root(from, root);
-
- retval = cgroup_attach_task(from_cg, tsk);
- if (retval)
- break;
- }
- cgroup_unlock();
-
- return retval;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cgroup_attach_task_all);
-
-/**
- * cgroup_attach_proc - attach all threads in a threadgroup to a cgroup
+ * cgroup_attach_task - attach a task or a whole threadgroup to a cgroup
* @cgrp: the cgroup to attach to
- * @leader: the threadgroup leader task_struct of the group to be attached
+ * @tsk: the task or the leader of the threadgroup to be attached
+ * @threadgroup: attach the whole threadgroup?
*
* Call holding cgroup_mutex and the group_rwsem of the leader. Will take
* task_lock of each thread in leader's threadgroup individually in turn.
*/
-static int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
+int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk,
+ bool threadgroup)
{
int retval, i, group_size;
struct cgroup_subsys *ss, *failed_ss = NULL;
- /* guaranteed to be initialized later, but the compiler needs this */
struct cgroupfs_root *root = cgrp->root;
+ struct task_struct *leader = tsk;
/* threadgroup list cursor and array */
- struct task_struct *tsk;
struct task_and_cgroup *tc;
struct flex_array *group;
struct cgroup_taskset tset = { };
@@ -2070,7 +1971,10 @@ static int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
* group - group_rwsem prevents new threads from appearing, and if
* threads exit, this will just be an over-estimate.
*/
- group_size = get_nr_threads(leader);
+ if (threadgroup)
+ group_size = get_nr_threads(tsk);
+ else
+ group_size = 1;
/* flex_array supports very large thread-groups better than kmalloc. */
group = flex_array_alloc(sizeof(*tc), group_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!group)
@@ -2080,7 +1984,6 @@ static int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
if (retval)
goto out_free_group_list;
- tsk = leader;
i = 0;
/*
* Prevent freeing of tasks while we take a snapshot. Tasks that are
@@ -2109,6 +2012,9 @@ static int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
retval = flex_array_put(group, i, &ent, GFP_ATOMIC);
BUG_ON(retval != 0);
i++;
+
+ if (!threadgroup)
+ break;
} while_each_thread(leader, tsk);
rcu_read_unlock();
/* remember the number of threads in the array for later. */
@@ -2193,6 +2099,30 @@ out_free_group_list:
return retval;
}
+/**
+ * cgroup_attach_task_all - attach task 'tsk' to all cgroups of task 'from'
+ * @from: attach to all cgroups of a given task
+ * @tsk: the task to be attached
+ */
+int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ struct cgroupfs_root *root;
+ int retval = 0;
+
+ cgroup_lock();
+ for_each_active_root(root) {
+ struct cgroup *from_cg = task_cgroup_from_root(from, root);
+
+ retval = cgroup_attach_task(from_cg, tsk, false);
+ if (retval)
+ break;
+ }
+ cgroup_unlock();
+
+ return retval;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cgroup_attach_task_all);
+
/*
* Find the task_struct of the task to attach by vpid and pass it along to the
* function to attach either it or all tasks in its threadgroup. Will lock
@@ -2262,9 +2192,10 @@ retry_find_task:
put_task_struct(tsk);
goto retry_find_task;
}
- ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk);
- } else
- ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
+ }
+
+ ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk, threadgroup);
+
threadgroup_unlock(tsk);
put_task_struct(tsk);
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index ace5bfc..c55763b 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2008,7 +2008,7 @@ static void cpuset_do_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
struct cgroup *new_cgroup = scan->data;
cgroup_lock();
- cgroup_attach_task(new_cgroup, tsk);
+ cgroup_attach_task(new_cgroup, tsk, false);
cgroup_unlock();
}
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6/8] cgroup: remove unneeded includes from cgroup.h
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-12 6:52 ` [PATCH 8/8] cgroup: consolidate cgroup_attach_task() and cgroup_attach_proc() Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 6:53 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Tejun Heo
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-12 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/cgroup.h | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
index 7e818a3..1f75a59 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -9,11 +9,8 @@
*/
#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/cpumask.h>
-#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
-#include <linux/cgroupstats.h>
#include <linux/prio_heap.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
@@ -22,6 +19,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
+struct cgroupstats;
struct cgroupfs_root;
struct cgroup_subsys;
struct inode;
-- 1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups
2013-03-12 6:49 [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Li Zefan
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-12 6:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] cgroup: remove unneeded includes from cgroup.h Li Zefan
@ 2013-03-12 22:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-13 1:06 ` Li Zefan
9 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2013-03-12 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zefan; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> If you're busy with other stuff, just take your time to go through those
> patches.
>
> 0001-cgroup-remove-cgroup_is_descentant.patch
> 0002-cgroup-remove-unused-variables-in-cgroup_destroy_loc.patch
> 0003-cgroup-hold-cgroup_mutex-before-calling-css_offline.patch
> 0004-cgroup-don-t-bother-to-resize-pid-array.patch
> 0005-cgroup-remove-useless-code-in-cgroup_write_event_con.patch
> 0006-cgroup-remove-unneeded-includes-from-cgroup.h.patch
> 0007-cgroup-fix-an-almost-harmless-off-by-one-bug.patch
> 0008-cgroup-consolidate-cgroup_attach_task-and-cgroup_att.patch
0001-0007 applied to cgroup/for-3.10. 0008 looks fine but in the diff
cgroup_attach_task_all() is removed completely and added back in
slightly different form. If you wanna keep the functions ordered like
you posted, please put a separate patch to move
cgroup_attach_task_all() before the consolidation.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups
2013-03-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups Tejun Heo
@ 2013-03-13 1:06 ` Li Zefan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2013-03-13 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: LKML, Cgroups
On 2013/3/13 6:38, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> If you're busy with other stuff, just take your time to go through those
>> patches.
>>
>> 0001-cgroup-remove-cgroup_is_descentant.patch
>> 0002-cgroup-remove-unused-variables-in-cgroup_destroy_loc.patch
>> 0003-cgroup-hold-cgroup_mutex-before-calling-css_offline.patch
>> 0004-cgroup-don-t-bother-to-resize-pid-array.patch
>> 0005-cgroup-remove-useless-code-in-cgroup_write_event_con.patch
>> 0006-cgroup-remove-unneeded-includes-from-cgroup.h.patch
>> 0007-cgroup-fix-an-almost-harmless-off-by-one-bug.patch
>> 0008-cgroup-consolidate-cgroup_attach_task-and-cgroup_att.patch
>
> 0001-0007 applied to cgroup/for-3.10. 0008 looks fine but in the diff
> cgroup_attach_task_all() is removed completely and added back in
> slightly different form.
At first I thought cgroup_attach_task() was static, so I thought I had
to either move cgroup_attach_task_all() after cgroup_attach_task(),
or add a forward declaration of cgroup_attach_task() in order to pass
compile.
Then I found it was extern, but I forgot to revert this diff.
Will send a v2.
> If you wanna keep the functions ordered like
> you posted, please put a separate patch to move
> cgroup_attach_task_all() before the consolidation.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread