Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: davinci: Add Kconfig support for ECAP & EHRPWM devices

[Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2195 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:54:08PM +0000, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 17:09:04, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> > On 3/14/2013 4:02 PM, Philip Avinash wrote:
> > > Add EHRPWM and ECAP support build support for DAVINCI_DA850 platforms.
> > > 
> > > Also, since DAVINCI platforms doesn't support TI-PWM-Subsystem module,
> > > remove the select option for CONFIG_PWM_TIPWMSS.
> > > 
> > > Also, update CONFIG_PWM_TIPWMSS compiler directive appropriately in
> > > pwm-tipwmss.h to fix the below compiler error upon removal of
> > > CONFIG_PWM_TIPWMSS for Davinci platforms.
> > > 
> > > 	drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c: In function 'ecap_pwm_probe':
> > > 	drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c:263:4: error: 'PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN' undeclared
> > > 	(first use in this function)
> > > 	drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c:263:4: note: each undeclared identifier
> > > 	is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > > 	drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c:264:17: error: 'PWMSS_ECAPCLK_EN_ACK'
> > > 	undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > 	drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c: In function 'ecap_pwm_remove':
> > > 	drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c:291:49: error: 'PWMSS_ECAPCLK_STOP_REQ'
> > > 	undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > 	make[2]: *** [drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.o] Error 1
> > > 	make[1]: *** [drivers/pwm] Error 2
> > > 	make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@ti.com>
> > 
> > >  config  PWM_TIECAP
> > >  	tristate "ECAP PWM support"
> > > -	depends on SOC_AM33XX
> > > -	select PWM_TIPWMSS
> > > +	depends on SOC_AM33XX || ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
> > 
> > Having such narrow dependencies is wrong. The same device is present on
> > DaVinci DA830 too. A depends on should not be required at all since the
> > driver should build on all architectures. But I have seen resistance to
> > doing that since users don't like to see configuration options totally
> > irrelevant for the architecture they are building for. So may be take a
> > middle path and do 'depends on ARCH_ARM'?
> 
> I will add dependency only on ARCH_ARM and submit another version.

Perhaps SOC_AM33XX || ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX would be an alternative?

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]