From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + atomic-improve-atomic_inc_unless_negative-atomic_dec_unless_positive .patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:24:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130314162413.GA21344@redhat.com> (raw)
> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> Subject: atomic: improve atomic_inc_unless_negative/atomic_dec_unless_positive
>
> Generally, both atomic_inc_unless_negative() and
> atomic_dec_unless_positive() need at least two atomic_cmpxchg() to
> complete the atomic operation. In fact, the 1st atomic_cmpxchg() is just
> used to read current value of the atomic variable at most times.
Agreed, this looks ugly...
But can't we make a simpler patch and keep the code simple/readable ?
Oleg.
--- x/include/linux/atomic.h
+++ x/include/linux/atomic.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static inline int atomic_inc_not_zero_hi
static inline int atomic_inc_unless_negative(atomic_t *p)
{
int v, v1;
- for (v = 0; v >= 0; v = v1) {
+ for (v = atomic_read(p); v >= 0; v = v1) {
v1 = atomic_cmpxchg(p, v, v + 1);
if (likely(v1 == v))
return 1;
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static inline int atomic_inc_unless_nega
static inline int atomic_dec_unless_positive(atomic_t *p)
{
int v, v1;
- for (v = 0; v <= 0; v = v1) {
+ for (v = atomic_read(p); v <= 0; v = v1) {
v1 = atomic_cmpxchg(p, v, v - 1);
if (likely(v1 == v))
return 1;
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 16:24 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-03-15 3:46 ` + atomic-improve-atomic_inc_unless_negative-atomic_dec_unless_positive .patch added to -mm tree Ming Lei
2013-03-15 13:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-15 15:13 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-15 16:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-15 17:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-15 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-15 18:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-15 20:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-16 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-17 17:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 17:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-21 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 18:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-21 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-21 22:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-22 12:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-22 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-16 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130314162413.GA21344@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).