From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753395Ab3CNWPF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:15:05 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:58938 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753273Ab3CNWPD (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:15:03 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: l891YlDm52nqoZGitaBHY3HoDOFdPJ09ucVFW1oEsoYK 1363299302 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:15:01 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Jiri Slaby Cc: stable , LKML , Tony Jones , Andrew Vagin , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [stable revert request] ... of doubled commit Message-ID: <20130314221501.GA30053@kroah.com> References: <513A5FC7.8040409@suse.cz> <513A663B.3090506@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <513A663B.3090506@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:29:15PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 03/08/2013 11:01 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Tony Jones found that the following commit: > > perf: Fix parsing of __print_flags() in TP_printk() > > is applied to 3.0 twice. > > > > Once as: > > commit 248f3235861683bb1ffc7316b56bf783b162666f > > Author: Steven Rostedt > > Date: Fri Nov 4 16:32:25 2011 -0400 > > > > perf: Fix parsing of __print_flags() in TP_printk() > > > > commit d06c27b22aa66e48e32f03f9387328a9af9b0625 upstream. > > > > ===== and ===== > > The second one is this: > > commit 2431496fbdd142ccc83138d94f3f510a36ce9270 > > Author: Steven Rostedt > > Date: Fri Nov 4 16:32:25 2011 -0400 > > > > perf: Fix parsing of __print_flags() in TP_printk() > > > > commit 49908a1b25d448d68fd26faca260e1850201575f upstream. > > > > ===== > > > > The latter is not an upstream commit, it is from pm-fixes, hence the > > difference in commit SHAs. > > git command I used was not perfect. It is an upstream commit (git is > kind of confused with these two commit. So am I.). However the rest of > the email is correct. Thanks for pointing this out, now reverted. greg k-h