From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754136Ab3CPJFy (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Mar 2013 05:05:54 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:30300 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752661Ab3CPJFw (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Mar 2013 05:05:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:05:40 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Eduardo Valentin Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/50] staging: omap-thermal: several code refactoring Message-ID: <20130316090540.GQ9138@mwanda> References: <1363352438-15935-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363352438-15935-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've reviewed this set. I hate to make people redo whole patchset sets, and I hate re-reviewing code. Obviously, I don't really like the bunny hop patches and I'm trying to discourage that going forward. ;P But I wouldn't say it's a "Redo the whole thing" kind of problem. Could just resend patch 33 and 47? You should probably be able to redo those without changing the rest. regards, dan carpenter