From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Northup <digitaleric@google.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all mmio sptes
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:36:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130319073648.GT11223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5147D858.4010805@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:15:36AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 03/19/2013 06:16 AM, Eric Northup wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Xiao Guangrong
> > <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> This patch tries to introduce a very simple and scale way to invalid all
> >> mmio sptes - it need not walk any shadow pages and hold mmu-lock
> >>
> >> KVM maintains a global mmio invalid generation-number which is stored in
> >> kvm->arch.mmio_invalid_gen and every mmio spte stores the current global
> >> generation-number into his available bits when it is created
> >>
> >> When KVM need zap all mmio sptes, it just simply increase the global
> >> generation-number. When guests do mmio access, KVM intercepts a MMIO #PF
> >> then it walks the shadow page table and get the mmio spte. If the
> >> generation-number on the spte does not equal the global generation-number,
> >> it will go to the normal #PF handler to update the mmio spte
> >>
> >> Since 19 bits are used to store generation-number on mmio spte, the
> >> generation-number can be round after 33554432 times. It is large enough
> >> for nearly all most cases, but making the code be more strong, we zap all
> >> shadow pages when the number is round
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> >> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >> arch/x86/kvm/mmutrace.h | 17 +++++++++++
> >> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 7 +++-
> >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 4 ++
> >> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +--
> >> 6 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> index ef7f4a5..572398e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> >> unsigned int n_requested_mmu_pages;
> >> unsigned int n_max_mmu_pages;
> >> unsigned int indirect_shadow_pages;
> >> + unsigned int mmio_invalid_gen;
> >
> > Could this get initialized to something close to the wrap-around
> > value, so that the wrap-around case gets more real-world coverage?
>
> I am afraid we can not. We cache the current mmio_invalid_gen into mmio spte when
> it is created no matter what the initiation value is.
>
> If you have a better way, please show me. ;)
>
The idea is to initialize mmio_invalid_gen to value close to MAX_GEN in
order to exercise
+ if (unlikely(kvm->arch.mmio_invalid_gen++ == MAX_GEN)) {
+ kvm->arch.mmio_invalid_gen = 0;
+ return kvm_mmu_zap_all(kvm);
+ }
path more often.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 15:26 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "KVM: x86: Optimize mmio spte zapping when, creating/moving memslot" Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-16 2:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-18 7:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] Revert "KVM: MMU: Mark sp mmio cached when creating mmio spte" Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: MMU: retain more available bits available on mmio spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-15 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: MMU: store generation-number into " Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-18 12:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 12:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-20 18:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-15 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all mmio sptes Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-16 2:13 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-18 7:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-17 15:02 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 8:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 9:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 12:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 12:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 13:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 13:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 13:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 13:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-18 13:32 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-18 22:16 ` Eric Northup
2013-03-19 3:15 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-19 7:36 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-19 7:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-16 2:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130319073648.GT11223@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=digitaleric@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox