Re: [ 00/75] 3.8.4-stable review

Shuah Khan
2013-03-19T01:09:14Z

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:51:37PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.8.4 release.
>> > There are 75 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Wed Mar 20 21:04:55 UTC 2013.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.8.4-rc1.gz
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>> >
>>
>> Here is the warn from 3.8.4-rc1
>> [ 700.009112] Component: resume devices, time: 10004
>> [ 700.009204] Modules linked in: ip6table_filter ip6_tables
>> ebtable_nat ebtables nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state
>> nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle xt_tcpudp
>> iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables bridge stp llc bnep rfcomm bluetooth
>> arc4 iwldvm snd_hda_codec_analog radeon snd_hda_intel mac80211
>> coretemp snd_hda_codec kvm_intel kvm snd_hwdep binfmt_misc snd_pcm
>> snd_seq_midi iwlwifi snd_rawmidi ttm snd_seq_midi_event cfg80211
>> drm_kms_helper pata_pcmcia snd_seq tpm_infineon drm psmouse snd_timer
>> joydev pcmcia snd_seq_device snd yenta_socket tpm_tis microcode
>> pcmcia_rsrc pcmcia_core ppdev dm_multipath i2c_algo_bit video hp_wmi
>> mac_hid sparse_keymap serio_raw soundcore snd_page_alloc lpc_ich wmi
>> hp_accel lis3lv02d input_polldev parport_pc lp parport firewire_ohci
>> sdhci_pci sdhci firewire_core crc_itu_t e1000e
>> [ 700.009212] Pid: 2637, comm: bash Not tainted 3.8.4-rc1+ #8
>
> Do you get this same warning on 3.9-rc3?
>
> I thought I got all of the needed fixes for this warning, what am I
> missing here?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

I think this is a new one. You did pull in the two patches you needed.
I am getting ready to test it in 3.9.0-rc1. Will let you know in a
bit. I have to do a git pull for the latest and do a compile.

-- Shuah