From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VFS deadlock ?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:26:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321202635.GA16406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyvwJK99YvDLDsazD4tWT6sNQO6kGM_1WyDdvwPNDxbLw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:15:08PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > #0 oddity aside, that looks very much like directory aliased by two different
> > dentries. Try to add
> > BUG_ON(p1->d_inode == p2->d_inode);
> > just before
> > mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
> > and see if it triggers.
>
> Don't do a BUG_ON(), instead do something like
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p1->d_inode == p2->d_inode)) {
> printk("pi=%s p2=%s\n", pi->d_name, p2->d_name);
> mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> return NULL;
> }
those are qstr's, so I used d_name.name, right ?
> so that we actually see where it is. I'm assuming it's some sysfs oddity again..
I'd be surprised actually, I've got sysfs excluded from its list of victim files,
due to unrelated issues still unresolved. So unless it followed a symlink into
sys from somewhere in /proc or /dev...
It took a few hours to reproduce last time, I'll increase the number of child
processes to see if I can trigger it faster now that I have the debug stuff in there.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 19:06 VFS deadlock ? Dave Jones
2013-03-21 19:21 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 20:31 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 19:29 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 20:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 20:26 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2013-03-21 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 20:36 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 20:47 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:02 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 21:26 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:41 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 21:55 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 22:03 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:52 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 22:12 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 22:29 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 23:07 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 23:36 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:12 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 0:20 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 0:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 1:22 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 1:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 1:40 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 4:37 ` [CFT] " Al Viro
2013-03-22 4:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 5:18 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 5:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 6:09 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 6:22 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 16:23 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-22 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 21:28 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 22:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-22 5:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:08 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 0:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130321202635.GA16406@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).