From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932111Ab3CUV03 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:26:29 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:46152 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753365Ab3CUV01 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:26:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:26:24 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Joe Perches Cc: Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: max98090: Remove executable bit Message-ID: <20130321212623.GK15926@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20130320163627.GS28775@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1363820072.16270.43.camel@joe-AO722> <20130321162503.GC14768@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1363886175.30275.10.camel@joe-AO722> <20130321174440.GG15926@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1363888393.30275.31.camel@joe-AO722> <20130321184458.GH15926@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1363893405.30275.39.camel@joe-AO722> <20130321203709.GJ15926@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1363898422.30275.47.camel@joe-AO722> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4e5ZDkbgLEOfWmLx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363898422.30275.47.camel@joe-AO722> X-Cookie: You will be run over by a bus. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --4e5ZDkbgLEOfWmLx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:40:22PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 21:37 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > you routinely send very trivial > > patches which don't apply cleanly > That's demonstrably false. It's sadly not, at least for the things I get to see - as far as I have been able to tell you submit against either Linus' tree or the last release (I think the former) rather than the relevant development trees or even -next which means that if anyone else has looked at the same area of code there will be conflicts. > I'm done with this conversation. Oh, well. Hopefully you'll take on board the feedback. --4e5ZDkbgLEOfWmLx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRS3r5AAoJELSic+t+oim9WXEP/jdUVnQTCHvs3LluOTcYyaJk eQKl6KH2mHUG+TM4dj3Wv5JosJ7IsU6mRn/ZunAHVqr103Dd8qkYMyXssY13Vajg e6iXM/F1bkrefc9qEC3RbvzvvmFS6lbxtzTNkmo2kWoVW5fyCNnykl0/p2QxCP+S itg63fF7+WBE7G+Gfm+JuNwFS1EDDtZD97DbEkcpUvoKOXCgGmUfBe359Qx6aEEi 8XadmT4f35l0zei1NiU4qtUo7z2RAlKgRekA5YRlrisPE7LW21vRSknh/BOdAvnH uwDkax3/W6WfKDxH6x3yxGWXFP/HgGFwY1ttK4QDjKlAUsy5eNGMy5ubBzEuhpCa 1/oTSxcxv+5Qf+FykP3mXMGZ+f5ONpCvBlDshXkgTZAUQnorRpNy9mCkOaCD1EbU CHQtQhUgGevCK5ycYaDr8WIQhPUyC1hEp7D6zQMIioUoV0NIKMLnyaYn/W2mWsXZ lWn1KjRFnDWcpwEw1Wz5mrW4Udn+Pv0/56tjoGYv3UNUzO8KHBWn1gvNvOiUGOxN +F+xgk/cGRtXUfLq0dGUEgEBzwPpURPRXYG3UDmNANoyssyY4enTAwQxEBsxUFmt jbC16ikXqx77u78Dem6cEVpljSCcuITEpcmmFCs6bQATMv8WskfUrVA/lLf42oOR 7NMsqJYyHPavK514Ez81 =bRGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4e5ZDkbgLEOfWmLx--