From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VFS deadlock ?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:29:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321222915.GA2756@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321221256.GA30620@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:12:56PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:18:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > here we go...
> > >
> > > WARNING: at fs/namei.c:2335 lock_rename+0x156/0x160()
> > > p1=irda p2=irda
> >
> > Ok, good. I ssupect it's /proc or /sys, we do have that entry there.
> >
> > But in fact I suspect we do want the parent name after all, because I
> > think we have multiple "irda" directories. There's the one in
> > /proc/net/ (added by net/irda/irproc.c), and there's a sysctl CTL_DIR
> > "irda" directory (kernel/sysctl_binary.c). And there might even be a
> > few other ones in /sys too, thanks to the ldisc called "irda" etc.
> >
> > I don't see where the shared inode comes from, but I suspect that
> > would be easier to guess if we actually see which particular case it
> > ends up being..
>
> it's not just irda fwiw..
>
> p1=rpc p2=rpc p1parent=net p2parent=net
>
> not sure why the printk with Al's last debugging info didn't print out..
> Investigating..
missing \n meant it didn't go over serial..
on screen however was..
path1: path2: proc 0 0
sanity check ?
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 57ae9c8..5afffe1 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -2282,6 +2332,26 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
return NULL;
}
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p1->d_inode == p2->d_inode)) {
+ static char path1[4096];
+ static char path2[4096];
+
+ printk(KERN_ERR "p1=%s p2=%s p1parent=%s p2parent=%s\n", p1->d_name.name, p2->d_name.name,
+ p1->d_parent->d_name.name,
+ p2->d_parent->d_name.name);
+
+ dentry_path(p1, path1, 4096);
+ dentry_path(p2, path2, 4096);
+
+ printk(KERN_ERR "path1:%s path2:%s %s %d %d\n",
+ path1, path2, p1->d_sb->s_type->name, d_unlinked(p1), d_unlinked(p2));
+
+
+ mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+
mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
p = d_ancestor(p2, p1);
@@ -2306,7 +2376,8 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
void unlock_rename(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
{
mutex_unlock(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex);
- if (p1 != p2) {
+
+ if (p1->d_inode != p2->d_inode) {
mutex_unlock(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 19:06 VFS deadlock ? Dave Jones
2013-03-21 19:21 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 20:31 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 19:29 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 20:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 20:26 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 20:36 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 20:47 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:02 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 21:26 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:41 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 21:55 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 22:03 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 21:52 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 22:12 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 22:29 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2013-03-21 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-21 23:07 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-21 23:36 ` Al Viro
2013-03-21 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:12 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 0:20 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 0:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 1:22 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 1:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 1:40 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 4:37 ` [CFT] " Al Viro
2013-03-22 4:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 5:18 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 5:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 6:09 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 6:22 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 16:23 ` Dave Jones
2013-03-22 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 21:28 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 22:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-22 5:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:08 ` Al Viro
2013-03-22 0:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-22 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130321222915.GA2756@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).