public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wfcqueue: functions for local append and enqueue
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:01:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130322020150.GA17809@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321114313.GA17275@dcvr.yhbt.net>

* Eric Wong (normalperson@yhbt.net) wrote:
> With level-triggered epoll, append/enqueue operations to the
> local/locked queues increase performance by avoiding unnecessary atomic
> operations and barriers.  These are necessary to avoid performance
> regressions when looping through ep_send_events and appending many
> items to a queue.

Sounds like a good idea,

> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
> ---
>   Benchmark for this coming with updated epoll patches.
> 
>  include/linux/wfcqueue.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/wfcqueue.h b/include/linux/wfcqueue.h
> index 9464a0c..7eb2aaa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/wfcqueue.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wfcqueue.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,49 @@ static inline bool wfcq_enqueue(struct wfcq_head *head,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * __wfcq_append_local: append one local queue to another local queue
> + *
> + * No memory barriers are issued.  Mutual exclusion is the responsibility
> + * of the caller.
> + *
> + * Returns false if the queue was empty prior to adding the node.
> + * Returns true otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool __wfcq_append_local(struct wfcq_head *head,

Following the rest of the header, we could use:

___wfcq_append() for this function,

> +		struct wfcq_tail *tail,
> +		struct wfcq_node *new_head,
> +		struct wfcq_node *new_tail)
> +{
> +	struct wfcq_node *old_tail;
> +
> +	old_tail = tail->p;
> +	tail->p = new_tail;
> +	old_tail->next = new_head;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Return false if queue was empty prior to adding the node,
> +	 * else return true.
> +	 */
> +	return old_tail != &head->node;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * wfcq_enqueue_local: enqueue a node into a local wait-free queue
> + *
> + * No memory barriers are issued.  Mutual exclusion is the responsibility
> + * of the caller.
> + *
> + * Returns false if the queue was empty prior to adding the node.
> + * Returns true otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool wfcq_enqueue_local(struct wfcq_head *head,

and:

__wfcq_enqueue()

we should also update the "Synchronization table" at the beginning of
the file accordingly.

Thoughts ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

> +		struct wfcq_tail *tail,
> +		struct wfcq_node *new_tail)
> +{
> +	return __wfcq_append_local(head, tail, new_tail, new_tail);
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * ___wfcq_busy_wait: busy-wait.
>   */
>  static inline void ___wfcq_busy_wait(void)
> -- 
> 1.8.2.rc3.2.g89ce8d6
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-22  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-11 21:36 [RFC PATCH] Linux kernel Wait-Free Concurrent Queue Implementation Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-14  4:22 ` Eric Wong
2013-03-14 13:18   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-14 19:07     ` Eric Wong
2013-03-14 19:48       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-14 21:32         ` Eric Wong
2013-03-15  2:38           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-16 22:02       ` Eric Wong
2013-03-17  2:03         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-18 10:37           ` Eric Wong
2013-03-15  0:49 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-15  2:08   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-21 11:43 ` [PATCH] wfcqueue: functions for local append and enqueue Eric Wong
2013-03-22  2:01   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2013-03-22 10:31     ` Eric Wong
2013-03-23 19:07       ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Wong
2013-03-23 19:43         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-23 20:42           ` [PATCH v3] " Eric Wong
2013-03-23 22:10             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-03-29  8:10 ` [PATCH] wfcqueue: add function for unsynchronized prepend Eric Wong
2013-04-02 13:05   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-04-02 21:15     ` Eric Wong
2013-04-06 21:42       ` [RFC PATCH] wfcqueue: implement __wfcq_enqueue_head() Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-04-11 21:23 ` [RFC PATCH] Linux kernel Wait-Free Concurrent Queue Implementation Eric Wong
2013-04-11 22:44   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130322020150.GA17809@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox