linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: pjt@google.com, paul.mckenney@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	tj@kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, venki@google.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com,
	Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com,
	charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/7] block: queue work on any cpu
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:05:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130322150519.GJ25978@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9aa157216e60de7d245128d42fb896918184ae8c.1363617402.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On Mon, Mar 18 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> block layer uses workqueues for multiple purposes. There is no real dependency
> of scheduling these on the cpu which scheduled them.
> 
> On a idle system, it is observed that and idle cpu wakes up many times just to
> service this work. It would be better if we can schedule it on a cpu which isn't
> idle to save on power.
> 
> By idle cpu (from scheduler's perspective) we mean:
> - Current task is idle task
> - nr_running == 0
> - wake_list is empty
> 
> This patch replaces schedule_work() and queue_[delayed_]work() with
> queue_[delayed_]work_on_any_cpu() siblings.
> 
> These routines would look for the closest (via scheduling domains) non-idle cpu
> (non-idle from schedulers perspective). If the current cpu is not idle or all
> cpus are idle, work will be scheduled on local cpu.

What are the performance implications of this? From that perspective,
scheduling on a local core is the better choice. Hopefully it's already
running on the local socket of the device, keeping it on that node would
be preferable.

For the delayed functions, the timer is typically added on the current
CPU. It's hard to know what the state of idleness of CPUs would be when
the delay has expired. How are you handling this?

I can see the win from a power consumption point of view, but it quickly
gets a little more complicated than that.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-22 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-18 15:23 [PATCH V3 0/7] Create sched_select_cpu() and use it for workqueues Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 1/7] sched: Create sched_select_cpu() to give preferred CPU for power saving Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 15:39   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-18 15:44     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 15:57       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-19  5:15         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-19 12:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-19 12:52     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-19 13:22       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 2/7] timer: hrtimer: Don't check idle_cpu() before calling get_nohz_timer_target() Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 3/7] workqueue: Add helpers to schedule work on any cpu Viresh Kumar
2013-03-19  5:15   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-19 13:23     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-21  0:12   ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-21 10:57     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-21 18:29       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 18:13         ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-29  2:39           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-29  7:27           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-29 17:40             ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-29 17:56               ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-30  3:30               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 4/7] PHYLIB: queue " Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 17:33   ` David Miller
2013-03-18 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 5/7] mmc: " Viresh Kumar
2013-03-19  7:58   ` Ulf Hansson
2013-03-22 17:09   ` Chris Ball
2013-03-22 17:26   ` Chris Ball
2013-03-22 17:27     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-22 17:30       ` Chris Ball
2013-03-18 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 6/7] block: " Viresh Kumar
2013-03-22 15:05   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2013-03-23  6:44     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-18 15:23 ` [PATCH V3 7/7] fbcon: " Viresh Kumar
2013-03-19  5:00 ` [PATCH V3 0/7] Create sched_select_cpu() and use it for workqueues Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130322150519.GJ25978@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
    --cc=charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).