From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>,
Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Paul Taysom <taysom@chromium.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: dm: dm-cache fails to write the cache device in writethrough mode
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:34:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130322223425.GA5638@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130322201151.GB5357@blackbox.djwong.org>
On Fri, Mar 22 2013 at 4:11pm -0400,
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
> The new writethrough strategy for dm-cache issues a bio to the origin device,
> remaps the bio to the cache device, and issues the bio to the cache device.
> However, the block layer modifies bi_sector and bi_size, so we need to preserve
> these or else nothing gets written to the cache (bi_size == 0). This fixes the
> problem where someone writes a block through the cache, but a subsequent reread
> (from the cache) returns old contents.
Your writethrough blkid test results are certainly strange. But I'm not
aware of where the block layer would modify bi_size and bi_sector;
please elaborate.
I cannot reproduce your original report. I developed
'test_writethrough_ext4_uuids_match', apologies for the ruby code:
def test_writethrough_ext4_uuids_match
size = meg(10)
# wipe the origin to ensure we don't accidentally have the same
# data on it.
with_standard_linear(:data_size => size) do |origin|
wipe_device(origin)
end
uuid = "deadbeef-cafe-dead-beef-cafedeadbeef"
# format the cache device with a specific uuid
with_standard_cache(:format => true,
:io_mode => :writethrough,
:data_size => size) do |cache|
fs = FS::file_system(:ext4, cache)
fs.format(:uuid => uuid)
FS::assert_fs_uuid(uuid, cache)
end
# origin should have the same uuid as the cache
with_standard_linear(:data_size => size) do |origin|
FS::assert_fs_uuid(uuid, origin)
end
end
This test was committed to the 'devel' branch of my thinp-test-suite
tree: git://github.com/snitm/thinp-test-suite.git
Also the existing 'test_writethrough' test works fine.
So for now:
Nacked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-22 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-22 20:11 [PATCH] dm: dm-cache fails to write the cache device in writethrough mode Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-22 20:21 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-22 20:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-22 21:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-22 22:34 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-03-22 23:16 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-23 3:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-23 3:48 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2013-03-23 5:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-23 21:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-23 22:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-25 23:59 ` [PATCH v2] dm cache: fix writes to " Mike Snitzer
2013-03-23 21:13 ` [dm-devel] dm: dm-cache fails to write the " Alasdair G Kergon
2013-03-23 3:00 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] " Alasdair G Kergon
2013-03-25 10:28 ` Joe Thornber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130322223425.GA5638@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=taysom@chromium.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox