* [PATCH 1/1] iommu: dmar_fault should only clear PPF/PFO field.
@ 2013-03-25 8:20 Li, Zhen-Hua
2013-03-26 15:03 ` Joerg Roedel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Li, Zhen-Hua @ 2013-03-25 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lizhenhua, Joerg Roedel, Ingo Molnar, Donald Dutile,
Hannes Reinecke, linux-kernel
Cc: Li, Zhen-Hua
When there is a dmar irq, dmar_fault is called and all of the fields
in FSTS are cleared. But ICE/IQE/ITE should not be cleared here,
they need to be processed and cleared in function qi_check_fault.
Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua <zhen-hual@hp.com>
---
drivers/iommu/dmar.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
index e5cdaf8..d620117 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ irqreturn_t dmar_fault(int irq, void *dev_id)
/* TBD: ignore advanced fault log currently */
if (!(fault_status & DMA_FSTS_PPF))
- goto clear_rest;
+ goto unlock_exit;
fault_index = dma_fsts_fault_record_index(fault_status);
reg = cap_fault_reg_offset(iommu->cap);
@@ -1245,11 +1245,12 @@ irqreturn_t dmar_fault(int irq, void *dev_id)
fault_index = 0;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->register_lock, flag);
}
-clear_rest:
- /* clear all the other faults */
- fault_status = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
- writel(fault_status, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
+ writel(DMA_FSTS_PPF, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
+ if (fault_status & DMA_FSTS_PFO)
+ writel(DMA_FSTS_PFO, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
+
+unlock_exit:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->register_lock, flag);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -1297,6 +1298,7 @@ int __init enable_drhd_fault_handling(void)
for_each_drhd_unit(drhd) {
int ret;
struct intel_iommu *iommu = drhd->iommu;
+ u32 fault_status;
ret = dmar_set_interrupt(iommu);
if (ret) {
@@ -1309,6 +1311,8 @@ int __init enable_drhd_fault_handling(void)
* Clear any previous faults.
*/
dmar_fault(iommu->irq, iommu);
+ fault_status = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
+ writel(fault_status, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
}
return 0;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu: dmar_fault should only clear PPF/PFO field.
2013-03-25 8:20 [PATCH 1/1] iommu: dmar_fault should only clear PPF/PFO field Li, Zhen-Hua
@ 2013-03-26 15:03 ` Joerg Roedel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2013-03-26 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Zhen-Hua
Cc: lizhenhua, Ingo Molnar, Donald Dutile, Hannes Reinecke,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:20:52PM +0800, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
> + writel(DMA_FSTS_PPF, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
> + if (fault_status & DMA_FSTS_PFO)
> + writel(DMA_FSTS_PFO, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
Changes this to:
writel(DMA_FSTS_PFO | DMA_FSTS_PPF, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
and applied the patch to iommu/vt-d, thanks.
Joerg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-26 15:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-25 8:20 [PATCH 1/1] iommu: dmar_fault should only clear PPF/PFO field Li, Zhen-Hua
2013-03-26 15:03 ` Joerg Roedel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox