Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()

[Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:58:26PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 16:58 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > +static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
> > +{
> > +       struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
> > +       int cpu, balance_cpu = -1;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
> > +        * to do the newly idle load balance.
> > +        */
> > +       if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
> > +               return 1;
> > +
> > +       /* Try to find first idle cpu */
> > +       for_each_cpu_and(cpu, sched_group_cpus(sg), env->cpus)
> > +               if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_group_mask(sg)) &&
> > +                       idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> > +                               balance_cpu = cpu;
> > +                               break;
> > +                       }
> 
> /me hands you a bucket of curlies too.. use them I'll send you another
> bucket when this one gets empty!

Thanks!

> (We always put in curlies on multi lines statements -- as opposed to
> multi statement blocks where they're required)

Okay. I will do that when respin.

Thanks.

> 
> > +
> > +       if (balance_cpu == -1)
> > +               balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(sg);
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched
> > group
> > +        * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above
> > domains.
> > +        */
> > +       if (balance_cpu != env->dst_cpu)
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/