public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/27] perf tools: Move programs check into config/Makefile
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:27:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130401222703.GC20943@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364854190.1728.12.camel@leonhard>

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:09:50AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 2013-04-01 (월), 21:18 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> > Moving programs check into config/Makefile.
> 
> [SNIP]
> 
> > +RM      = rm -f
> > +MKDIR   = mkdir
> > +FIND    = find
> > +INSTALL = install
> > +FLEX    = flex
> > +BISON   = bison
> > +STRIP  ?= strip
> 
> Why does STRIP use "?=" form?
> 
> I know you just moved the line, but AFAICS it can be converted to a
> normal variable assignment, right?

not sure, I guess someone found usefull to use custom strip 

> 
> 
> > @@ -140,14 +140,6 @@ ifneq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),clean)
> >  ifneq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),tags)
> >  -include config/feature-tests.mak
> >  
> > -ifeq ($(call get-executable,$(FLEX)),)
> > -	dummy := $(error Error: $(FLEX) is missing on this system, please install it)
> > -endif
> > -
> > -ifeq ($(call get-executable,$(BISON)),)
> > -	dummy := $(error Error: $(BISON) is missing on this system, please install it)
> > -endif
> > -
> >  ifeq ($(call try-cc,$(SOURCE_HELLO),$(CFLAGS) -Werror -fstack-protector-all,-fstack-protector-all),y)
> >  	CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -fstack-protector-all
> >  endif
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> > index fe317c2..04bf8ac 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> > @@ -32,3 +32,13 @@ endif
> >  ifeq ($(NO_PERF_REGS),0)
> >          BASIC_CFLAGS += -DHAVE_PERF_REGS
> >  endif
> > +
> > +-include config/feature-tests.mak
> 
> It seems now it's redundant to include this file?

The 'config/feature-tests.mak' stuff is still needed for the rest
of the Makefile at this point. Althought all the checking stuff is
moved with final patch into config/Makefile, I wanted middle commit
to stay functional.

Now I wonder if I include 'config/feature-tests.mak' from 'config/Makefile'
wether it afects top level Makefile environment or not (my initial thought).
I'll double check that and remove if necessary.

thanks,
jirka

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-01 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-01 19:18 [RFC 00/27] perf tools: Build changes and kbuild support Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 01/27] perf tools: Add automated make test suite Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:53   ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-04-01 21:09     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 02/27] perf tools: Fix tab vs spaces issue in Makefile ifdef/endif Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:49   ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-04-01 21:11     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 03/27] perf tools: Move arch check into config/Makefile Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:54   ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-04-01 21:07     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 21:54   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-04-01 22:00     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 04/27] perf tools: Move programs " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 22:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-04-01 22:27     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2013-04-02  3:59       ` Namhyung Kim
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 05/27] perf tools: Move compiler and linker flags " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 22:20   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-04-01 23:06     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 06/27] perf tools: Move libelf check config " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 07/27] perf tools: Move libdw " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 08/27] perf tools: Move libunwind " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 09/27] perf tools: Move libaudit " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 10/27] perf tools: Move slang " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 11/27] perf tools: Move gtk2 " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 12/27] perf tools: Move libperl " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 13/27] perf tools: Move libpython " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 14/27] perf tools: Move libbfd " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 15/27] perf tools: Move stdlib " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 16/27] perf tools: Move libnuma " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 17/27] perf tools: Move paths " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 18/27] perf tools: Final touches for CHK config move Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 19/27] perf tools: Merge all *CFLAGS* make variable into CFLAGS Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 20/27] perf tools: Merge all *LDFLAGS* make variable into LDFLAGS Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 21/27] perf tools: Switch to full patch C include directories Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 22/27] perf tools: Add NO_BIONIC variable to confiure bionic setup Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 23/27] kbuild: Introduce KBUILD_AUTOCONF variable for auto.conf include Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 24/27] kbuild: Introduce KCONFIG_AUTOCONFIGDEP variable for conf tool Jiri Olsa
2013-04-11 10:29   ` Michal Marek
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 25/27] perf tools: Kbuild builtin source related fixies Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 26/27] perf tools: Kbuild " Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 27/27] perf tools: Add kbuild support into Makefile.kbuild Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 20:03   ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-04-01 21:05     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-04-01 20:45 ` [RFC 00/27] perf tools: Build changes and kbuild support David Ahern
2013-04-01 21:18   ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130401222703.GC20943@krava.redhat.com \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox