From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78]
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 09:30:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402073035.GD3670@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402071937.GC3670@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Apr 02 2013, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02 2013, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > [Added jens Axboe to CC]
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:08:49AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
> > > Saw on almost all the servers range from x64, ppc64 and s390x with kernel
> > > 3.9-rc5 and xfsprogs-3.1.10. Never caught this in 3.9-rc4, so looks like
> > > something new broke this. Log is here with sysrq debug info.
> > > http://people.redhat.com/qcai/stable/log
>
> CAI Qian, can you try and back the below out and test again?
Nevermind, it's clearly that one. The below should improve the
situation, but it's not pretty. A better fix would be to allow
auto-deletion even if PART_NO_SCAN is set.
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index fe5f640..d6c5764 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1057,14 +1057,15 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
struct disk_part_iter piter;
struct hd_struct *part;
- mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, 1);
- invalidate_partition(bdev->bd_disk, 0);
- disk_part_iter_init(&piter, bdev->bd_disk,
- DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY);
- while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
- delete_partition(bdev->bd_disk, part->partno);
- disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
- mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+ if (mutex_trylock(&bdev->bd_mutex, 1))
+ invalidate_partition(bdev->bd_disk, 0);
+ disk_part_iter_init(&piter, bdev->bd_disk,
+ DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY);
+ while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
+ delete_partition(bdev->bd_disk, part->partno);
+ disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
+ mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+ }
}
/*
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1462091996.435156.1364882416199.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-04-02 6:08 ` xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78 CAI Qian
2013-04-02 7:05 ` Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78] Dave Chinner
2013-04-02 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 7:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2013-04-02 8:39 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-02 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 9:31 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-02 9:48 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-03 11:41 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-03 15:41 ` Phillip Susi
2013-04-04 20:30 ` Phillip Susi
2013-04-09 6:55 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 7:01 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-09 7:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 7:24 ` Jens Axboe
2013-05-28 14:51 ` Phillip Susi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402073035.GD3670@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox