From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Ilija Hadzic <ihadzic@research.bell-labs.com>,
Marco Munderloh <munderl@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
Cc: Ilija Hadzic <ilijahadzic@gmail.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fix i_mapping and f_mapping initialization in drm_open in error path
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:25:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402082547.GA24345@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1304011249370.27674@umail>
On Mon 01-04-13 13:14:50, Ilija Hadzic wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> >On Sat 30-03-13 18:26:53, Ilija Hadzic wrote:
> >>This looks a bit like a hack and it doesn't look right,
> >>conceptually. If the call fails, it should restore things as if
> >>nothing has ever happened and overwriting old_mapping is not going to
> >>do the trick.
> >
> >OK, I thought this is what the patch does as it falls back to
> >&inode->i_data which is the default mapping for all inodes or it uses
> >what used to be in device mapping.
> >
> >I am obviously not familiar with the drm code but it feels a bit strange
> >that the device mapping can be different than inode's resp. file's one
>
> The reason for this is explained in commit message associated with
> 949c4a34.
>
> In summary, the device's mapping is that of the inode associated with the
> first opener. Before 949c4a34, subsequent openers would have to come in
> through exactly the same inode that the first opener came in
> (otherwise the open call would fail). So if a user did something
> like: start X, remove /dev/dri/cardN file, mknod the same file
> again, the applications started after such an action would stop
> working. Also, using the GPU from chroot-ed environment was not
> possible if there was another opener from different root.
Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification.
> The 949c4a34, removed this restriction, but introduced a problem
> with VmWare GPU drivers, which fdb40a08. However, fdb40a08
> introduced the bug that you have reported.
>
> The problem that I have with your proposed fix is that if the first
> opener fails, it can set the device's mapping to that of the inode
> that was never used and never opened (and could even be removed
> later down the road).
Makes sense.
> >and even more confusing that inode and file are saved separately.
> >
>
> I was trying to quickly get out the patch that was safe in terms of
> introducing new breakage. So the "conservative" thing to do (without
> having to think through all possible scenarios) was to restore each
> of the three pointers from their own temporary variable. Thinking
> about it, you are probably right that file descriptor's and inode's
> mapping pointer are equal when open call is entered so we could use
> one variable. However, you still need a separate variable to store
> the device's mapping pointer because that one can be different.
Right.
> Attached is a v2 of the patch, for reference. I would appreciate if
> the original reporter or you tested it in lieu of your proposed
> patch and let me know if it fixes your issue.
OK, this is a call for Marco. I have attached this bug to our bugzilla
as well (just for reference:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807850)
>
> -- Ilija
> From 7e3c832158e2552e5e106a588e2b9e61c35b68f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ilija Hadzic <ihadzic@research.bell-labs.com>
> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:20:35 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] drm: correctly restore mappings if drm_open fails
>
> If first drm_open fails, the error-handling path will
> incorrectly restore inode's mapping to NULL. This can
> cause the crash later on. Fix by separately storing
> away mapping pointers that drm_open can touch and
> restore each from its own respective variable if the
> call fails.
>
> Reference:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-March/036564.html
>
> v2: use one variable to store file and inode mapping
> since they are the same at the function entry; also
> fix spelling mistakes in commit message.
>
> Reported-by: Marco Munderloh <munderl@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic <ihadzic@research.bell-labs.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Thanks!
> Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic <ihadzic@research.bell-labs.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> index 13fdcd1..429e07d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ int drm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> int retcode = 0;
> int need_setup = 0;
> struct address_space *old_mapping;
> + struct address_space *old_imapping;
>
> minor = idr_find(&drm_minors_idr, minor_id);
> if (!minor)
> @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ int drm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> if (!dev->open_count++)
> need_setup = 1;
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> + old_imapping = inode->i_mapping;
> old_mapping = dev->dev_mapping;
> if (old_mapping == NULL)
> dev->dev_mapping = &inode->i_data;
> @@ -159,8 +161,8 @@ int drm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>
> err_undo:
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> - filp->f_mapping = old_mapping;
> - inode->i_mapping = old_mapping;
> + filp->f_mapping = old_imapping;
> + inode->i_mapping = old_imapping;
> iput(container_of(dev->dev_mapping, struct inode, i_data));
> dev->dev_mapping = old_mapping;
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 19:56 [PATCH] drm: fix i_mapping and f_mapping initialization in drm_open in error path Michal Hocko
2013-03-30 22:26 ` Ilija Hadzic
2013-03-31 10:34 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-01 18:14 ` Ilija Hadzic
2013-04-02 8:25 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-04-02 10:36 ` Marco Munderloh
[not found] ` <CA+4h6HkOSPUpfT-5Hwe+zRkmSdhURM6Tv4RxM+9PMCEvG+tjZw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-02 12:01 ` Marco Munderloh
2013-04-02 13:31 ` Ilija Hadzic
2013-04-02 13:48 ` Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402082547.GA24345@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ihadzic@research.bell-labs.com \
--cc=ilijahadzic@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=munderl@tnt.uni-hannover.de \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox