From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: mpc512x_dma: use generic DMA DT bindings
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:01:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304021901.51705.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402182215.GO10326@intel.com>
On Tuesday 02 April 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 06:17:59PM +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > Add generic DMA bindings and register the DMA controller
> > to DT DMA helpers.
> I need someone who understands DT better than me to comment/ack...
> Arnd...?
> >
> > +struct mpc_dma_filter_args {
> > + struct mpc_dma *mdma;
> > + unsigned int chan_id;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static bool mpc_dma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
> > +{
> > + struct mpc_dma_filter_args *fargs = param;
> > +
> > + if (chan->device != &fargs->mdma->dma)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return (chan->chan_id == fargs->chan_id);
> > +}
This assumes that there is a 1:1 mapping between channels and request lines,
which is unusual, but I assume it's correct for the hardware.
> > @@ -791,11 +830,26 @@ static int mpc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> > /* Register DMA engine */
> > dev_set_drvdata(dev, mdma);
> > retval = dma_async_device_register(dma);
> > - if (retval) {
> > - devm_free_irq(dev, mdma->irq, mdma);
> > - irq_dispose_mapping(mdma->irq);
> > + if (retval)
> > + goto reg_err;
> > +
> > + if (dev->of_node) {
> > + retval = of_dma_controller_register(dev->of_node,
> > + mpc_dma_xlate, mdma);
> > + if (retval) {
> > + dev_err(&op->dev,
> > + "could not register of_dma_controller\n");
> > + goto of_err;
> > + }
> > }
Here we rely on the fact that all device trees including this dma engine
have a correct representation of the device, which breaks backwards
compatibility with old device trees, which don't yet follow the binding
or don't need to because they only use memory-to-memory channels.
You can easily make it backwards compatible by making the above a
non-fatal error and just continuing here even if of_dma_controller_register
failed. If compatiblity is not a concern, the above is good.
The main thing missing is a binding file in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mpc512x-dma.txt
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-31 16:17 [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: mpc512x_dma: use generic DMA DT bindings Anatolij Gustschin
2013-03-31 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: mpc512x: add slave sg and device control operations Anatolij Gustschin
2013-05-16 13:04 ` [2/2] " Alexander Popov
2013-04-02 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: mpc512x_dma: use generic DMA DT bindings Vinod Koul
2013-04-02 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-04-08 10:46 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-04-09 11:42 ` Anatolij Gustschin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304021901.51705.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=agust@denx.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox