From: Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Sebastian Wankerl <sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com>,
i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 12:40:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130406104053.GA24710@yoda.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365156435.1970.31.camel@dabdike>
Hello.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:07:15PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> Just so you know: this isn't a parisc specific problem. Gcc produces
> duplicate section names under various circumstances, but the one that
> bites us is -ffunction-sections. Note that there are proposals to use
> -ffunction-sections on all architectures (so we can garbage collect
> unused functions) in which case you'll induce the bug identified in
> 35dead4235e2b67da7275b4122fed37099c2f462 on every architecture
I am not able to produce an object file with duplicate section names
using gcc on x86. Even with -ffunction-sections, every section gets a
unique name. Is this architecture-specific behaviour of gcc?
Greetings,
Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-06 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 13:08 [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-04 1:00 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-04 9:40 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-05 4:00 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-05 9:40 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-05 10:07 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06 4:52 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-06 10:52 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06 15:16 ` John David Anglin
2013-04-07 1:22 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-07 1:45 ` John David Anglin
2013-04-06 10:40 ` Philip Kranz [this message]
2013-04-08 4:14 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-08 11:55 ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-11 14:11 ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-05 14:56 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-06 4:31 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130406104053.GA24710@yoda.lan \
--to=philip.kranz@googlemail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox