From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:16:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130408151609.GA13640@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365428154.1830.99.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
* Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ,
> ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added
> in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove
> these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> Untested. These three symbols were added in commit
> 6beb000923882f6204ea2cfcd932e568e900803f ("locking: Make inlining
> decision Kconfig based").
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 ---
> kernel/Kconfig.locks | 10 ----------
> 2 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index eb8fb62..8c544d2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ config S390
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_TRYLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH
> - select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK_BH
> @@ -80,7 +79,6 @@ config S390
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK_BH
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_BH
> - select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_BH
> @@ -89,7 +87,6 @@ config S390
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_TRYLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH
> - select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> select ARCH_SAVE_PAGE_KEYS if HIBERNATION
> select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> index 44511d1..c438507 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_BH
> bool
>
> -config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ
> - bool
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> bool
>
> @@ -53,13 +50,9 @@ config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK
> config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH
> bool
>
> -config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
> - bool
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> bool
>
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_TRYLOCK
> bool
>
> @@ -81,9 +74,6 @@ config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK
> config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH
> bool
>
> -config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
> - bool
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> bool
Erm, if you look at the code in question you'll see that they are unused I think
due to a bug:
config INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
def_bool y
depends on !PREEMPT || ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH
Shouldn't that depend on ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ?
Similarly for the others.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 13:35 [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols Paul Bolle
2013-04-08 15:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-04-08 15:30 ` Paul Bolle
2013-04-08 15:32 ` Paul Bolle
2013-04-08 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-17 8:51 ` [PATCH v2] locking: Fix copy/paste errors "ARCH_INLINE_*_UNLOCK_BH" Paul Bolle
2013-05-17 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-28 12:55 ` [tip:core/locking] locking: Fix copy/paste errors of " ARCH_INLINE_*_UNLOCK_BH" tip-bot for Paul Bolle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130408151609.GA13640@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).