From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965384Ab3DIJTb (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:19:31 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:25919 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935294Ab3DIJT1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:19:27 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,437,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="315218754" Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:23:19 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, Jean Delvare , Andy Shevchenko , Christian Ruppert Subject: Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint Message-ID: <20130409092319.GF21818@intel.com> References: <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20130409090605.GC28509@the-dreams.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130409090605.GC28509@the-dreams.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:06:05AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:57AM -0000, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > It is not good idea to mix static and dynamic I2C adapter numbering. In > > this particular case on Lynxpoint we had graphics I2C adapter which took > > the first numbers preventing the designware I2C driver from using the > > adapter numbers it preferred. > > > > Fix this by switching to use dynamic adapter numbering on Intel Lynxpoint. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > > I am fearing regressions here if the bus numbering changes. There are no users for this dynamic numbering yet since it was introduced with the Lynxpoint support.