From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S936973Ab3DIJdN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:33:13 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:12842 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932892Ab3DIJdL (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:33:11 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,437,1363158000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="292246009"
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:37:22 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        ben-linux@fluff.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Subject: Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint
Message-ID: <20130409093722.GH21818@intel.com>
References: <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <20130409090605.GC28509@the-dreams.de>
 <20130409092319.GF21818@intel.com>
 <20130409092923.GF3624@the-dreams.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130409092923.GF3624@the-dreams.de>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:29:24AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:23:19PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:06:05AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:57AM -0000, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > It is not good idea to mix static and dynamic I2C adapter numbering. In
> > > > this particular case on Lynxpoint we had graphics I2C adapter which took
> > > > the first numbers preventing the designware I2C driver from using the
> > > > adapter numbers it preferred.
> > > > 
> > > > Fix this by switching to use dynamic adapter numbering on Intel Lynxpoint.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > I am fearing regressions here if the bus numbering changes.
> > 
> > There are no users for this dynamic numbering yet since it was introduced
> > with the Lynxpoint support.
> 
> Please add this to the commit msg.

Sure, thanks.