From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
efault@gmx.de, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend v5] sched: fix init NOHZ_IDLE flag
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:56:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130411145618.GA15699@somewhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364996263-12198-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:37:43PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On my smp platform which is made of 5 cores in 2 clusters, I have the
> nr_busy_cpu field of sched_group_power struct that is not null when the
> platform is fully idle. The root cause is:
> During the boot sequence, some CPUs reach the idle loop and set their
> NOHZ_IDLE flag while waiting for others CPUs to boot. But the nr_busy_cpus
> field is initialized later with the assumption that all CPUs are in the busy
> state whereas some CPUs have already set their NOHZ_IDLE flag.
>
> More generally, the NOHZ_IDLE flag must be initialized when new sched_domains
> are created in order to ensure that NOHZ_IDLE and nr_busy_cpus are aligned.
>
> This condition can be ensured by adding a synchronize_rcu between the
> destruction of old sched_domains and the creation of new ones so the NOHZ_IDLE
> flag will not be updated with old sched_domain once it has been initialized.
> But this solution introduces a additionnal latency in the rebuild sequence
> that is called during cpu hotplug.
>
> As suggested by Frederic Weisbecker, another solution is to have the same
> rcu lifecycle for both NOHZ_IDLE and sched_domain struct. I have introduce
> a new sched_domain_rq struct that is the entry point for both sched_domains
> and objects that must follow the same lifecycle like NOHZ_IDLE flags. They
> will share the same RCU lifecycle and will be always synchronized.
>
> The synchronization is done at the cost of :
> - an additional indirection for accessing the first sched_domain level
> - an additional indirection and a rcu_dereference before accessing to the
> NOHZ_IDLE flag.
>
> Change since v4:
> - link both sched_domain and NOHZ_IDLE flag in one RCU object so
> their states are always synchronized.
>
> Change since V3;
> - NOHZ flag is not cleared if a NULL domain is attached to the CPU
> - Remove patch 2/2 which becomes useless with latest modifications
>
> Change since V2:
> - change the initialization to idle state instead of busy state so a CPU that
> enters idle during the build of the sched_domain will not corrupt the
> initialization state
>
> Change since V1:
> - remove the patch for SCHED softirq on an idle core use case as it was
> a side effect of the other use cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Ok, the lockless scheme involving nr_buzy_cpus and rq flags seem to be correct now.
We can hope somebody will come up with a less complicated solution. But for now that's
the best fix I've seen.
I just have a few comments on details.
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 6 +++
> kernel/sched/core.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 35 +++++++++++------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 24 +++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index d35d2b6..2a52188 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -959,6 +959,12 @@ struct sched_domain {
> unsigned long span[0];
> };
>
> +struct sched_domain_rq {
> + struct sched_domain *sd;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct rcu_head rcu; /* used during destruction */
> +};
So the reason for this level of indirection won't be intuitive for those
who read that code. Please add some comments that explain why we need
that. ie: because we need the object lifecycle of sched_power and flags to be the
same for the lockless scheme to work.
> +
> static inline struct cpumask *sched_domain_span(struct sched_domain *sd)
> {
> return to_cpumask(sd->span);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7f12624..69e2313 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5602,6 +5602,15 @@ static void destroy_sched_domains(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> destroy_sched_domain(sd, cpu);
> }
>
> +static void destroy_sched_domain_rq(struct sched_domain_rq *sd_rq, int cpu)
> +{
> + if (!sd_rq)
> + return;
> +
> + destroy_sched_domains(sd_rq->sd, cpu);
> + kfree_rcu(sd_rq, rcu);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Keep a special pointer to the highest sched_domain that has
> * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCE set (Last Level Cache Domain) for this
> @@ -5632,10 +5641,23 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
> * hold the hotplug lock.
> */
> static void
> -cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
> +cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain_rq *sd_rq, struct root_domain *rd,
> + int cpu)
> {
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> - struct sched_domain *tmp;
> + struct sched_domain_rq *tmp_rq;
old_sd_rq would be a clearer name.
> + struct sched_domain *tmp, *sd = NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we don't have any sched_domain and associated object, we can
> + * directly jump to the attach sequence otherwise we try to degenerate
> + * the sched_domain
> + */
> + if (!sd_rq)
> + goto attach;
> +
> + /* Get a pointer to the 1st sched_domain */
> + sd = sd_rq->sd;
>
> /* Remove the sched domains which do not contribute to scheduling. */
> for (tmp = sd; tmp; ) {
> @@ -5658,14 +5680,17 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
> destroy_sched_domain(tmp, cpu);
> if (sd)
> sd->child = NULL;
> + /* update sched_domain_rq */
> + sd_rq->sd = sd;
> }
>
> +attach:
> sched_domain_debug(sd, cpu);
>
> rq_attach_root(rq, rd);
> - tmp = rq->sd;
> - rcu_assign_pointer(rq->sd, sd);
> - destroy_sched_domains(tmp, cpu);
> + tmp_rq = rq->sd_rq;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(rq->sd_rq, sd_rq);
> + destroy_sched_domain_rq(tmp_rq, cpu);
>
> update_top_cache_domain(cpu);
[...]
> +static void __sdrq_free(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct s_data *d)
> +{
> + int j;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(j, cpu_map)
> + if (*per_cpu_ptr(d->sd_rq, j))
> + kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(d->sd_rq, j));
kfree(NULL) works.
> +}
> +
> +static void build_sched_domain_rq(struct s_data *d, int cpu)
> +{
> + struct sched_domain_rq *sd_rq;
> + struct sched_domain *sd;
> +
> + /* Attach sched_domain to sched_domain_rq */
> + sd = *per_cpu_ptr(d->sd, cpu);
> + sd_rq = *per_cpu_ptr(d->sd_rq, cpu);
> + sd_rq->sd = sd;
> + /* Init flags */
> + set_bit(NOHZ_IDLE, sched_rq_flags(sd_rq));
> +}
> +
> struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
> struct s_data *d, const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
> struct sched_domain_attr *attr, struct sched_domain *child,
> @@ -6495,6 +6572,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
> struct sched_domain_attr *attr)
> {
> enum s_alloc alloc_state = sa_none;
> + struct sched_domain_rq *sd_rq;
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> struct s_data d;
> int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -6547,11 +6625,18 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
> }
> }
>
> + /* Init objects that must follow the sched_domain lifecycle */
> + for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> + build_sched_domain_rq(&d, i);
> + }
I suggest you put the above domain_rq initialization before the domain
initialization.
So that we have that more intuitively ordered initialization:
* set up domains_rq
* set up domains
* set up sched groups
* set up sched groups power
> +
> /* Attach the domains */
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> - sd = *per_cpu_ptr(d.sd, i);
> - cpu_attach_domain(sd, d.rd, i);
> + sd_rq = *per_cpu_ptr(d.sd_rq, i);
> + cpu_attach_domain(sd_rq, d.rd, i);
> + /* claim allocation of sched_domain_rq object */
> + *per_cpu_ptr(d.sd_rq, i) = NULL;
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
[...]
> @@ -5673,7 +5681,12 @@ static void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
>
> static inline int on_null_domain(int cpu)
> {
> - return !rcu_dereference_sched(cpu_rq(cpu)->sd);
> + struct sched_domain_rq *sd_rq =
> + rcu_dereference_sched(cpu_rq(cpu)->sd_rq);
> + struct sched_domain *sd = NULL;
> + if (sd_rq)
> + sd = sd_rq->sd;
Is it possible to have sd_rq->sd == NULL ?
> + return !sd;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index cc03cfd..f589306 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ struct rq {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> struct root_domain *rd;
> - struct sched_domain *sd;
> + struct sched_domain_rq *sd_rq;
>
> unsigned long cpu_power;
>
> @@ -505,21 +505,37 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> -#define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(p) \
> +#define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain_rq(p) \
> rcu_dereference_check((p), \
> lockdep_is_held(&sched_domains_mutex))
>
> +#define get_sched_domain_rq(cpu) \
> + rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain_rq(cpu_rq(cpu)->sd_rq)
How about rcu_dereference_domain_rq()? It seems important to me that
we keep the rcu_dereference_*() naming so that we don't hide what really
happens there behind a more opaque naming.
I mean RCU is tricky to deal with and it's important not to obfuscate its use.
> +
> +#define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(cpu) ({ \
> + struct sched_domain_rq *__sd_rq = get_sched_domain_rq(cpu); \
> + struct sched_domain *__sd = NULL; \
> + if (__sd_rq) \
> + __sd = __sd_rq->sd; \
Same question for the NULL sd.
> + __sd; \
> +})
> +
> +#define sched_rq_flags(sd_rq) (&sd_rq->flags)
Hm, why this "sched_" prefix? Maybe rq_domain_flags() ?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 13:37 [PATCH Resend v5] sched: fix init NOHZ_IDLE flag Vincent Guittot
2013-04-04 14:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-04 14:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-04 17:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-04 17:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09 7:16 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-09 12:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-10 15:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-11 14:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-04-12 8:23 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130411145618.GA15699@somewhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox