From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762341Ab3DKWou (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:44:50 -0400 Received: from mail.openrapids.net ([64.15.138.104]:51276 "EHLO blackscsi.openrapids.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752968Ab3DKWot (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:44:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:44:45 -0400 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Eric Wong Cc: Lai Jiangshan , "Paul E. McKenney" , Stephen Hemminger , Davide Libenzi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Linux kernel Wait-Free Concurrent Queue Implementation Message-ID: <20130411224445.GA1125@Krystal> References: <20130311213602.GB9829@Krystal> <20130411212308.GA21778@dcvr.yhbt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130411212308.GA21778@dcvr.yhbt.net> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://www.efficios.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Eric Wong (normalperson@yhbt.net) wrote: > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > It is provided as a starting point only. Test cases should be ported > > from Userspace RCU to kernel space and thoroughly ran on a wide range of > > architectures before considering this port production-ready. > > Hi Mathieu, any progress on this front? Nope, I've been busy on other things. > I'm not sure how to approach > test cases in the kernel, perhaps taking hints from locking_selftest() > would be a start. I guess creating a wfcq_selftest() derived from userspace RCU test_urcu_wfcq.c might be a good start. > Fwiw, I've been running wfcqueue+epoll for a few weeks now on my > personal machines without problems :) Great! Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com