From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Pan, Zhenjie" <zhenjie.pan@intel.com>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"acme@ghostprotocols.net" <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NMI: fix NMI period is not correct when cpu frequency changes issue.
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:39:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418133927.GJ79013@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBTpzSBEezx4ScwYYX6L8ir4GLBG9MMYJuAb6YA0QbiurQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:04:00PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 06:57 +0000, Pan, Zhenjie wrote:
> >> Watchdog use performance monitor of cpu clock cycle to generate NMI to detect hard lockup.
> >> But when cpu's frequency changes, the event period will also change.
> >> It's not as expected as the configration.
> >> For example, set the NMI event handler period is 10 seconds when the cpu is 2.0GHz.
> >> If the cpu changes to 800MHz, the period will be 10*(2000/800)=25 seconds.
> >> So it may make hard lockup detect not work if the watchdog timeout is not long enough.
> >> Now, set a notifier to listen to the cpu frequency change.
> >> And dynamic re-config the NMI event to make the event period correct.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Urgh,. does this really matter.. all we really want is for that NMI to
> > hit eventually in the not too distant future. Does the frequency really
> > matter _that_ much?
> >
> I agree, it does not really matter. Set the watchdog to a couple of minutes
> and it should be fine, shouldn't it?
I believe it mattered to the Chrome folks. They want the watchdog to be as
tight as possible so the user experience isn't a hang but a quick reboot
instead. They like setting the watchdog to something like 2 seconds.
There was a patch a few months ago that tried to hack around this issue
and I suggested this approach as a better solution. I forgot what the
original problem was. Perhaps someone can jump in and explain the problem
being solved (other than the watchdog isn't always 10 seconds)?
Cheers,
Don
>
> > Also, can't we simply pick an event that's invariant to the cpufreq
> > nonsense? Something like CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF -- or better the
> > fixed_ctr2 which nobody ever uses anyway.
> >
> You don't want to use fixed counter 2 for NMI watchdog because it's pinned.
> No other counter can count this event. And it is very useful. I use it often.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-16 6:57 [PATCH v2] NMI: fix NMI period is not correct when cpu frequency changes issue Pan, Zhenjie
2013-04-18 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-18 12:04 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-18 13:39 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2013-04-22 0:50 ` Pan, Zhenjie
2013-04-22 18:59 ` Don Zickus
2013-04-23 0:52 ` Pan, Zhenjie
2013-04-22 20:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-23 18:14 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130418133927.GJ79013@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhenjie.pan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox