From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load average
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:25:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130419082546.GA25370@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51701722.1070407@windriver.com>
* Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 13-04-18 07:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 11:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of stuff
> >>> out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files. The code relating to load average
> >>> calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it in a
> >>> separate file.
> >>>
> >>> Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c (~10%).
> >>>
> >>> A couple small static functions in the core sched.h header were also localized
> >>> to their singular user in sched/fair.c at the same time, with the goal to also
> >>> reduce the amount of "broadcast" content in that sched.h file.
> >>
> >> Nice!
> >>
> >> Peter, is this (and the naming of the new file) fine with you too?
> >
> > Yes and no.. that is I do like the change, but I don't like the
> > filename. We have _waaaay_ too many different things we call load_avg.
> >
> > That said, I'm having a somewhat hard time coming up with a coherent
> > alternative :/
>
> Several of the relocated functions start their name with "calc_load..."
> Does "calc_load.c" sound any better?
Peter has a point about load_avg being somewhat of a misnomer: that's not your
fault in any way, we created overlapping naming within the scheduler and are now
hurting from it.
Here are the main scheduler 'load' concepts we have right now:
- The externally visible 'average load' value extracted by tools like 'top' via
/proc/loadavg and handled by fs/proc/loadavg.c. Internally the naming is all
over the map: the fields that are updated are named 'avenrun[]', most other
variables and methods are named calc_load_*(), and a few callbacks are named
*_cpu_load_*().
- rq->cpu_load, a weighted, vectored scheduler-internal notion of task load
average with multiple run length averages. Only exposed by debug interfaces but
otherwise relied on by the scheduler for SMP load balancing.
- se->avg - per entity (per task) load average. This is integrated differently
from the cpu_load - but work is ongoing to possibly integrate it with the
rq->cpu_load metric. This metric is used for CPU internal execution time
allocation and timeslicing, based on nice value priorities and cgroup
weights and constraints.
Work is ongoing to integrate rq->cpu_load and se->avg - eventually they will
become one metric.
It might eventually make sense to integrate the 'average load' calculation as well
with all this - as they really have a similar purpose, the avenload[] vector of
averages is conceptually similar to the rq->cpu_load[] vector of averages.
So I'd suggest to side-step all that existing confusion and simply name the new
file kernel/sched/proc.c - our external /proc scheduler ABI towards userspace.
This is similar to the already existing kernel/irq/proc.c pattern.
A technical request: mind doing your patch against the tip:master tree? It's at:
git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git master
We have changes pending both in the sched/core, timers/nohz, core/locking and
smp/hotplug trees, and your split-up interacts with all that pending work,
creating conflicts.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-13 0:04 [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load average Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-13 0:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: fork load calculation code from sched/core --> sched/load_avg Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-13 0:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: move update_load_[add/sub/set] from sched.h to fair.c Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-13 4:30 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load average Rakib Mullick
2013-04-14 0:06 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-15 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-18 11:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-18 15:54 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-18 17:06 ` Rakib Mullick
2013-04-18 23:13 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-18 23:43 ` Paul Turner
2013-04-19 2:17 ` Charles Wang
2013-04-19 6:13 ` Rakib Mullick
2013-04-19 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-04-19 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-19 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-19 17:05 ` Rakib Mullick
2013-04-21 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130419082546.GA25370@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox