* [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor updates
@ 2013-04-22 15:20 Steven Rostedt
2013-04-22 15:20 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Compare to 1 instead of zero for is_signed_type() Steven Rostedt
2013-04-22 15:20 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracepoints: Prevent null probe from being added Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2013-04-22 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Frederic Weisbecker
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
This will be added to the queue for 3.10 and uploaded to my for-next
branch in my git repo.
Sahara (1):
tracepoints: Prevent null probe from being added
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (1):
tracing: Compare to 1 instead of zero for is_signed_type()
----
include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 2 +-
kernel/tracepoint.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Compare to 1 instead of zero for is_signed_type()
2013-04-22 15:20 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor updates Steven Rostedt
@ 2013-04-22 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-22 15:20 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracepoints: Prevent null probe from being added Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2013-04-22 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Frederic Weisbecker, Bjorn Helgaas,
Gary Hade
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1711 bytes --]
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The formats of the trace events show if the type of a event field
is signed or not via a macro called is_signed_type(). This does
a trick with the type and compares a -1 to zero after typecasting
to the tested type. If it returns true, it's signed, otherwise
its not. But this unfortunately triggers a warning by gcc:
warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false
As we know it is always false (that's why we do it), this is a
false warning. Luckily for us, the comparison works with a 1 as
well, without giving the warning.
Convert the check to compare (type)-1 < (type)0 to (type)-1 < (type)1
to determine if the type is signed or not.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAErSpo4YXcY9fuOKWYGDkddJwk68kmZTohsmVB6QvrhjboOh1Q@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reported-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
index 4e28b01..34e00fb 100644
--- a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ extern int trace_define_field(struct ftrace_event_call *call, const char *type,
extern int trace_add_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
extern void trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
-#define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < (type)0)
+#define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
int trace_set_clr_event(const char *system, const char *event, int set);
--
1.7.10.4
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracepoints: Prevent null probe from being added
2013-04-22 15:20 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor updates Steven Rostedt
2013-04-22 15:20 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Compare to 1 instead of zero for is_signed_type() Steven Rostedt
@ 2013-04-22 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2013-04-22 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Frederic Weisbecker,
Mathieu Desnoyers, Sahara
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2530 bytes --]
From: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com>
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add_probe() function allows a null probe function.
And, this may lead to unexpected results since the number of probe
functions in an entry can be counted by checking whether a probe is null
or not in the for-loop.
This patch prevents a null probe from being added.
In tracepoint_entry_remove_probe() function, checking probe parameter
within the for-loop is moved out for code efficiency, leaving the null probe
feature which removes all probe functions in the entry.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1365991995-19445-1-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/tracepoint.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
index d96ba22..99e7e31 100644
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ tracepoint_entry_add_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry,
int nr_probes = 0;
struct tracepoint_func *old, *new;
- WARN_ON(!probe);
+ if (WARN_ON(!probe))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
debug_print_probes(entry);
old = entry->funcs;
@@ -152,13 +153,18 @@ tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry,
debug_print_probes(entry);
/* (N -> M), (N > 1, M >= 0) probes */
- for (nr_probes = 0; old[nr_probes].func; nr_probes++) {
- if (!probe ||
- (old[nr_probes].func == probe &&
- old[nr_probes].data == data))
- nr_del++;
+ if (probe) {
+ for (nr_probes = 0; old[nr_probes].func; nr_probes++) {
+ if (old[nr_probes].func == probe &&
+ old[nr_probes].data == data)
+ nr_del++;
+ }
}
+ /*
+ * If probe is NULL, then nr_probes = nr_del = 0, and then the
+ * entire entry will be removed.
+ */
if (nr_probes - nr_del == 0) {
/* N -> 0, (N > 1) */
entry->funcs = NULL;
@@ -173,8 +179,7 @@ tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry,
if (new == NULL)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
for (i = 0; old[i].func; i++)
- if (probe &&
- (old[i].func != probe || old[i].data != data))
+ if (old[i].func != probe || old[i].data != data)
new[j++] = old[i];
new[nr_probes - nr_del].func = NULL;
entry->refcount = nr_probes - nr_del;
--
1.7.10.4
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-22 15:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-22 15:20 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor updates Steven Rostedt
2013-04-22 15:20 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Compare to 1 instead of zero for is_signed_type() Steven Rostedt
2013-04-22 15:20 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracepoints: Prevent null probe from being added Steven Rostedt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox