From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Unsigned widening casts of binary "not" operations..
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:47:35 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130424074735.GB1751@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130424072630.GB1780@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:26:30AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > And there's quite a lot of them. Even in my (fairly small) config I use on
> > my desktop. And the first warnings I see are in x86 code:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:405:16: warning: implicit unsigned widening
> > cast of a '~' expression
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c:912:15: warning: implicit unsigned
> > widening cast of a '~' expression
>
> Hm, the perf_event_p4.c code is indeed confused.
>
> I think the bug is real but probably benign in effect: we allow narrower
> values into the MSR register than probably intended. Only a couple of low
> bits are reserved AFAICS.
>
> Here's an (untested!) patch that tries to untangle it all: it just moves
> to clean 64-bit types everywhere - these MSRs are 64-bit wide regardless
> of whether we run on 32-bit or not.
>
> Would be nice if someone with a working P4 could test it - Cyrill? [It
> should also be double checked whether the high words are really not
> reserved and can be written to ...]
Hi Ingo! Ufortunately I don't have access to real p4 hardware,
thus I'm CC'ing Ming who has been helping a lot in testing
this code pieces.
Still the patch itself is perfectly fine to me
Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+55aFwpLu0qNms=hkQr43yqD0K9DgESNm91OEWKT1ZuT8MU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-23 0:23 ` Unsigned widening casts of binary "not" operations Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 8:59 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 14:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 15:24 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 15:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 15:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-23 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 17:37 ` David Miller
2013-04-23 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 17:56 ` David Miller
2013-04-23 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-24 12:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-04-23 0:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-23 13:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-24 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-24 7:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2013-04-25 1:13 ` Lin Ming
2013-04-24 17:07 ` [PATCH] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-24 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-25 14:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-26 16:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-26 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-26 17:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 14:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 16:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 0:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-28 17:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-28 17:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-28 17:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 22:48 ` [PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-24 23:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 23:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-25 1:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-26 14:20 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/P4: Robistify P4 PMU types tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2013-04-26 16:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-26 16:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-04-26 16:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-26 16:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-04-27 16:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-27 16:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130424074735.GB1751@moon \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox