public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] xen/spinlock: Disable IRQ spinlock (PV) allocation on PVHVM
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:34:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130429183450.GB9431@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304261718420.4180@kaball.uk.xensource.com>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > See git commit f10cd522c5fbfec9ae3cc01967868c9c2401ed23
> > (xen: disable PV spinlocks on HVM) for details.
> > 
> > But we did not disable it everywhere - which means that when
> > we boot as PVHVM we end up allocating per-CPU irq line for
> > spinlock. This fixes that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> 
> Is there any point in calling xen_init_lock_cpu in PVHVM guests?

I was thinking about it.. but I still have hope that I will be able to
take Jeremy's patches for paravirt locking and redo them a bit.

> At that point we might as well remove the call from xen_hvm_cpu_notify.
> 
> 
> >  arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> > index 47ae032..8b54603 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> > @@ -367,6 +367,13 @@ void __cpuinit xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
> >  	WARN(per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu) > 0, "spinlock on CPU%d exists on IRQ%d!\n",
> >  	     cpu, per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu));
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * See git commit f10cd522c5fbfec9ae3cc01967868c9c2401ed23
> > +	 * (xen: disable PV spinlocks on HVM)
> > +	 */
> > +	if (xen_hvm_domain())
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "spinlock%d", cpu);
> >  	irq = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_SPIN_UNLOCK_VECTOR,
> >  				     cpu,
> > @@ -385,12 +392,26 @@ void __cpuinit xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
> >  
> >  void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * See git commit f10cd522c5fbfec9ae3cc01967868c9c2401ed23
> > +	 * (xen: disable PV spinlocks on HVM)
> > +	 */
> > +	if (xen_hvm_domain())
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu), NULL);
> >  	per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu) = -1;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * See git commit f10cd522c5fbfec9ae3cc01967868c9c2401ed23
> > +	 * (xen: disable PV spinlocks on HVM)
> > +	 */
> > +	if (xen_hvm_domain())
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xen_spinlock) > sizeof(arch_spinlock_t));
> >  
> >  	pv_lock_ops.spin_is_locked = xen_spin_is_locked;
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.4
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-29 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-16 20:08 [PATCH] fixes for v3.10 in the CPU hotplug patch (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-16 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] xen/smp: Fix leakage of timer interrupt line for every CPU online/offline Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:06   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] xen/smp/spinlock: Fix leakage of the spinlock " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:06   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 3/9] xen/time: Fix kasprintf splat when allocating timer%d IRQ line Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:11   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-29 18:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 4/9] xen/events: Check that IRQ value passed in is valid Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:12   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] xen/time: Add default value of -1 for IRQ and check for that Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:15   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 6/9] xen/spinlock: Check against default value of -1 for IRQ line Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-29 18:35     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 7/9] xen/spinlock: Disable IRQ spinlock (PV) allocation on PVHVM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:20   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-29 18:34     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] xen/smp/pvhvm: Don't initialize IRQ_WORKER as we are using the native one Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-26 16:27   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-29 18:34     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-01 13:25       ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-01 14:57         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-01 15:07           ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-16 20:09 ` [PATCH 9/9] xen/smp: Unifiy some of the PVs and PVHVM offline CPU path Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130429183450.GB9431@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox