From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761320Ab3EAMQY (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 08:16:24 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:59780 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759910Ab3EAMQR (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 08:16:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 14:14:22 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alex Shi Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, jkosina@suse.cz, clark.williams@gmail.com, tony.luck@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] sched: use runnable load based balance Message-ID: <20130501121421.GA19602@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1367040344-14485-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1367040344-14485-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:25:38PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > This patchset bases on tip/sched/core. > > The patchset remove the burst wakeup detection which had worked fine on 3.8 Was this part of the original series from PJT or some patches afterwards? I missed a few months worth of patches so any extra information to help me catch up is greatly appreciated :-) > kernel, since the aim7 is very imbalance. But rwsem write lock stealing > enabled in 3.9 kernel. aim7 imbalance disappeared. So the burst wakeup > care doesn't needed. How does this follow.. surely something else can cause burst wakeups just fine too? > Peter, > Would you like to consider pick up the patchset? or give some comments? :) I'll go read them.. :-)