From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932879Ab3ECOJ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 10:09:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:43149 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932501Ab3ECOJy (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 10:09:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:09:49 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Linus Walleij Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Linus WALLEIJ , Srinidhi KASAGAR Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: Remove DMA address look-up table Message-ID: <20130503140949.GN24153@gmail.com> References: <1367484683-3479-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > DMA addresses are now passed as part of the dmaengine API by invoking > > dmaengine_slave_config(). So there's no requirement for the DMA40 > > driver to look them up in a table provided by platform data. This > > method does not fit in well using Device Tree either. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > This goes on top of some other changes right? > > Right now the DMA series is confusing me a bit, there is > these 6 patches: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136698179306642&w=2 > > Then these 5 patches: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136740201416293&w=2 > > And then this single patch. Right. I can prepare one big branch if you like. > Where shall I start, i.e. which patches go first? > > Can they all be combined into one big series? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog