public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: acme@infradead.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Expand definition of sysfs format attribute
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 11:08:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130506010829.GA32607@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408072422.GA4476@concordia>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:24:22PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
> > ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
> > examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
> > change, as we are defining something that was previously undefined, but
> > others may disagree.
> > 
> > The POWER8 PMU would like to define overlapping ranges, as bit ranges in
> > the event code have different meanings for certain events. It will also
> > allow us to define an overarching "event" field, that encompasses all
> > others.
> > 
> > As far as I can see perf is comfortable with this change, however I am
> > not sure if there are any other users of the interface.
> 
> Any comments on this one?

Hi Arnaldo,

I think the consensus from Peter and Jiri was that this was OK, are you
happy to merge it?

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-06  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-04  4:21 [RFC/PATCH] perf: Expand definition of sysfs format attribute Michael Ellerman
2013-04-08  7:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-05-06  1:08   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2013-05-06  8:20     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-05-06 11:36       ` Jiri Olsa
2013-04-08  9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 11:57   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-04-08 15:51     ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-10 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130506010829.GA32607@concordia \
    --to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox