From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load calculations
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 11:26:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130506092657.GA9227@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130421091846.GE31470@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
>
> > Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of
> > stuff out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files. The code relating to load
> > calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it in
> > a separate file.
> >
> > Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c (~10%).
> >
> > A couple small static functions in the core sched.h header were also localized
> > to their singular user in sched/fair.c at the same time, with the goal to also
> > reduce the amount of "broadcast" content in that sched.h file.
> >
> > Paul.
> > ---
> >
> > v2 changes:
> >
> > 1) rebase from tip's sched/core (v3.9-rc1-38-gb329fd5) to today's
> > tip master (v3.9-rc6-2031-g27f8b76).
> > 2) rename file from load_avg.c to proc.c
>
> Thanks, looks good to me. Note, I'll try to apply this after the initial
> round of trees went to Linus in the merge window, to reduce interactions
> between the trees. [...]
Ok, all relevant trees are now upstream - mind sending a refreshed series
against upstream merge commit 534c97b0950b or later?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 19:10 [PATCHv2 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load calculations Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-19 19:10 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] sched: fork load calculation code from sched/core --> sched/proc Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-07 14:10 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Factor out load calculation code from sched/core.c --> sched/proc.c tip-bot for Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-19 19:10 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] sched: move update_load_[add/sub/set] from sched.h to fair.c Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-07 14:12 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Move update_load_*() methods " tip-bot for Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-21 9:18 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load calculations Ingo Molnar
2013-05-06 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-05-06 14:21 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130506092657.GA9227@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox