public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load calculations
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 11:26:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130506092657.GA9227@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130421091846.GE31470@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
> > Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of
> > stuff out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files.  The code relating to load
> > calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it in
> > a separate file.
> > 
> > Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c (~10%).
> > 
> > A couple small static functions in the core sched.h header were also localized
> > to their singular user in sched/fair.c at the same time, with the goal to also
> > reduce the amount of "broadcast" content in that sched.h file.
> > 
> > Paul.
> > ---
> > 
> > v2 changes:
> > 
> >   1) rebase from tip's sched/core (v3.9-rc1-38-gb329fd5) to today's
> >      tip master (v3.9-rc6-2031-g27f8b76).
> >   2) rename file from load_avg.c to proc.c
> 
> Thanks, looks good to me. Note, I'll try to apply this after the initial 
> round of trees went to Linus in the merge window, to reduce interactions 
> between the trees. [...]

Ok, all relevant trees are now upstream - mind sending a refreshed series 
against upstream merge commit 534c97b0950b or later?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-06  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 19:10 [PATCHv2 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load calculations Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-19 19:10 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] sched: fork load calculation code from sched/core --> sched/proc Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-07 14:10   ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Factor out load calculation code from sched/core.c --> sched/proc.c tip-bot for Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-19 19:10 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] sched: move update_load_[add/sub/set] from sched.h to fair.c Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-07 14:12   ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Move update_load_*() methods " tip-bot for Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-21  9:18 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] sched: move content out of core files for load calculations Ingo Molnar
2013-05-06  9:26   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-05-06 14:21     ` Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130506092657.GA9227@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox